Just to be clear: you would be completely, 100% JUSTIFIED in using violence against a Journalist.
However, it is simply not safe because the journalists are working for the occupation. So, you are going to have to deal with journalists non-violently and legally.
But that doesn’t mean you have to be “nice” or “polite.” It’s long past time for that.
So they “hacked” the Christian crowd-funding site and “leaked” the names of everyone who donated some money to help Our Hero Truckers.
Journalists are not “neutral third parties” – they are soldiers in the war against Americans. You are morally and legally obliged to treat them as dangerous predators and enemy combatants.
Now the scumbags at the Washington Post and the New York Times – remember, these are people who lie for a living, smeared the survivors of the 9/11 attacks, lied about WMD’s in Iraq and all, 100%, support the Jewish genocide of Palestinians – are stalking regular people and trying gin up a mob to attack them.
Journalists are like pedophiles standing outside the schoolyard looking for a child that seems vulnerable enough to snatch and molest.
Journalist = Pedophile. You are morally justified in using violence to protect a child from a pedophile, but you can’t as long as we are all under an occupation by pedophiles.
So let’s win this one legally and non-violently.
They will find some regular person who voted for Donald Trump and then single them out for “publicity.”
There is really only one thing to do in situations like this. Vox Day once set up SJWList.com which listed the names and affiliations of people who had demanded “deplatforming” of people for voting against the Democrats.
The thing is there are far fewer of them then there are of us.
Recently they have tried to pass legislation making it so a “journalist” can lie about you, smear you, and gin up a mob against you, but if you criticize a “journalist” by name, that is somehow a tort if not a crime.
One obvious thing that should be done:
- Find out where a “journalist” lives.
- Go door-to-door meeting the neighbors and explain to them there is a journalist predator in the neighborhood, and let them know what they can do to protect themselves.
- I’d suggest more than just a fence, etc., I would be pointing a live, 24/7 camera streamed to the Internet at their house.
- If people are serious – and it is time to be serious – they need to do this, no matter how much you don’t like it:
5. WARN YOUR CHILDREN TO NOT INTERACT WITH THEIR CHILDREN AT SCHOOL.
At school, the little league team, the coffeeshop, make sure your children and all of their friends know to NEVER SPEAK WITH THE CHILD OF A JOURNALIST.
This is just protecting yourself and your family from a predator. If we could get child services to save these children from their predator parents, that would be fine.
But we don’t live in that world, so you must learn to protect yourself and your family.
6. If they can follow a Congresswoman into the restroom and film her for the Internet, journalists – who are public figures with no expectation of privacy – can also be filmed everywhere they – and their families – go.
Fortunately, journalists tend to be extreme narcissists so they always put their name on everything. They are more decentralized than usual these days so that will make it more difficult, but we can “crowd-source” this work.
So I guess the first thing to do is read the bylines of the journalists, create profiles of them – I suggest using anonymous websites to post the information – and then start warning people.
I think of it like a “Live Neighborhood Watch.” When the journalist leaves for work in the morning, somebody send a text or click a button on the website. When you find out where they are eating lunch, post that to the site.
If a journalist still has custody of their children and the worthless Child Protective Services does nothing, then you have no choice but to warn people about their children too.
America is under an occupation. This war will almost certainly turn hot one day – it is already hot on the other side, they are literally killing us every single day.
We can’t use violence at this point in history. But we don’t have to, we can win without using violence.
But we can’t win by being “nice” to journalists.
It is a war, a war via non-violent and legal means. For now.
But don’t think it is not a war.
Banned Hipster 
The SJWList was me. A guy who goes by Cynic in Chief did the site admin and a couple of other moderators tried to help, as they understood it, but in effect I created all the content on that site. (WerePuppy actually did help, but I’m not exaggerating by a lot. Look at the early edit history by “Lee Pereira” if you disbelieve me.)
One of the takeaways from this is that crowdsourcing is a load of shit. It’s Price’s Law all the way down. Either some autistic retard on the internet takes the idea and runs it all the way to the endzone, or it doesn’t happen. I wish it were different, but this is the reality I’ve run into headfirst over and over. I’ve always wanted to collaborate with friends on projects. There’s nothing I enjoy more than pursuing something meaningful with another person. But I could only begin to list the reasons why people flake out, it’s just not a plausible strategy when 99.99% of people have delusions of grandeur and zero practice doing anything except consume product.
There are other takeaways and such we could discuss but it’s important to understand consumerism has 100% entirely replaced politics.
LikeLike
I suppose the more important takeaway is for everyone to understand there are no perpetual motion machines. You will always put more of yourself into a productive activity than you get back, full stop. And in the modern day, you need to expect to swallow a few black pills along the way as well, it’s just part of the territory now because production requires realism and all the human realities are bleaker than we can comprehend.
If you go in with this expectation, that a 1% gain will cost you 99% of your sanity and not a small amount of money, then I wish you godspeed. This is the self-sacrificing heroism that builds nations from nothing. The greater truth in all this is that you don’t get out as much as you put in, except insofar as self-sacrifice gives us a sense of meaningful human connection despite humans being a bunch of shitheads. The other part is you get treasure in heaven, if you believe that sort of thing literally (I do, hence the seemingly insane dedication to doing the right thing), which makes it all downright rational as an investment strategy. I mean, there’s no sense losing money.
LikeLike
@Aeoli Pera
I very much take the point that there are no perpetual motion machines and that “crowdfunding” is bullshit.
Also I’ll have to completely agree that if all this requires “self-sacrificing heroism that builds nations from nothing” then count me out. I’m not a hero nor particularly interested in self-sacrifice.
The key is gamification, and the Israelis behind QAnon not only proved that it could work, they scared the shit out of the establishment so much they are trying to censor the entire Internet.
I always use Amazing Polly as an example. She could have gotten into any Gamified issue, but QAnon was there when she started, and she switched over to Covid right after that.
It was “gamified” – she got Internet points, views, publicity, even some Paypal money – for playing the game more skillfully than others.
And like Pokemon Go, it is “enhanced reality.” When Amazing Polly started to do her research, she uncovered real things that were not in the original QAnon script.
It is sort of like how the Pizzagate thing worked. Whatever crazy story – they were killing kids in the basement or whatever – obviously was not just false, but crazy.
But no one involved in the personal and business network of the owner of Comet Ping Pong could stand for a second the gaze of the Eye of Sauron, so to speak. No, he wasn’t killing kids in the basement of a Pizza shop – but they very much don’t want people thinking about what they are, in fact, doing.
Gamification of a majoritarian strategy, where the enemy is a defined minority, is terrifying to any minority likely to be singled out, especially if that minority has vested anti-majoritarian interests.
LikeLike
> Also I’ll have to completely agree that if all this requires “self-sacrificing heroism that builds nations from nothing” then count me out. I’m not a hero nor particularly interested in self-sacrifice.
That’s the crux of our difference on this, but there are some specific applications where I can imagine hashing out a middle ground. For example, there may be no perpetual motion machines but there is such a thing as removing the control rods from a reactor, which is how I would describe QAnon. I’ll drop a more detailed comment tomorrow morning.
LikeLike
This ended up being less of a middle ground than I envisioned and more of a polemic. Oh well.
So the base difference, as mentioned, is I believe history is made by small groups of fanatics and everyone else is a spectator. Terrorists are predominantly engineers because they are higher in both autism and competence, which sidesteps a lot of these issues. In application the key difference is I don’t believe you can get spectators to do anything constructive, but you can get them to be marginally destructive (think rioting) given a host of preconditions:
– They think it will be fun
– The expect absolutely zero risk of negative consequences
– Everyone else (that they know) is doing it
– They feel they are morally righteous in doing so
– They genuinely believe it will benefit them personally and quickly (i.e. you are paying them)
– They suspect it will make them popular, high-status, and/or well-liked
– They have been slowly habituated to the experience over time through a carefully engineered series of training experiences
– They feel like it’s a democratic experience where every decision is made by emergent consensus and no one is in charge (i.e. no obligation to follow anyone’s orders or show deference to rank as determined by a third party)
– They feel free to quit at any time, with no commitment
– The particular action is in no way “cringe”
– It doesn’t interfere with their existing self-concept (e.g. if they are a pacifist)
You can see why high-IQ, alienated, autistic engineers are easier material to work with.
In essence, we’re talking about an entire nation of frightful coomers who have a “wealth” of custom-tailored fantasy worlds and chemical addictions competing for their attention. Can you gamify their radicalization theme park as a streaming service on a platform they already use? And make it free? And a pseudo-religious experience? The competence issue is just as bad, as even if they could be convinced to whitewash a fence it’s unlikely they could complete the task. For example, I recently had a Zoomer member of a school coding group drop out of a meeting to have an anxiety attack and fall asleep for 14 hours straight. (It was a little stressful, but we weren’t storming the beaches at Normandy.)
With that setup in mind, let’s imagine how such men could be enticed to find their balls and dox a journalist.
QAnon is a great example because it fits all the points above. It’s fun, there’s no risk, everyone’s already doing it, it’s God’s Plan, it’s going to pay off in two weeks, you’re an insider Patriot who’s going to be in charge come the revolution, it follows the same Marvel movie script you’ve seen a million times, it’s an “emergent” grassroots phenomenon with no rules, no responsibilities, no boss to dislike, everyone you disagree with can be dismissed as a fed (i.e. you never have to learn to live with ideological disagreements), you can put down your phone at any moment and no longer be in the movement, it’s a customer experience tailored to marketing feedback (i.e. not “cringe”), and it appeals to an existing Evangelical ideology (itself a QAnon-like operation from the previous century). Such people will now and then dox a gentile journalist.
My contention is that it’s a lot less work to just do it yourself. The whole point of creating QAnon is that they dox journalists less often than they otherwise might via the autism which is endemic to white people.
To end on a positive note, I have a working theory that I’m still struggling to put into words about why white people sacralize jokes as the most fundamental form of free speech. Even when the king was divine, the jester was allowed to poke him. For better or worse, this is more fundamental to our culture than organized religion. Free speech is something like the medium through which karma travels, where more jokes equals a higher rate of karmic retribution. Leaving the theory aside, I’ll just say that I believe on a near-mystical level that simply repeating the truth to people over and over will lead to the operation of some justice, somehow, through some kind of Underpants Gnome mechanism of action.
– Live in such a way that people feel deep down you deserve to be heard
– There’s no credibility booster like self-sacrifice
– Do the most basic sales technique of taking yourself out of the picture so you can meet people where they’re at and explain things in terms they understand
?????????????
– Some justice, somehow
Anyway, thank you for your attention and giving me permission to put my thoughts together in writing. Maybe I’m wrong, but I suspect even in that case it’s a productive and interesting kind of wrong.
LikeLike
@Aeoli Pera
Malcolm Kyeyune has some interesting pushback against this attitude. I’ve spent twenty years complaining about the damn sheeple who only want to watch their TV and don’t care about the truth of 9/11. But that is just the way people are.
For every active fanatic there are a hundred thousand simply uninterested, but if the fanatic is lucky they get a fan club of a certain size. They aren’t fanatics but will cheer the fanatic on and perhaps even assist in some limited way. They are the people for whom gamification can work. The hundred thousand don’t care because on some level they are just fine with the way things are.
I don’t know about white people sacralizing jokes but I, personally, tend to have exactly that attitude. And I’m white, so you may be on to something here!
I’m guessing you are younger than me and you live in California and simply have no idea what “Evangelicals” actually are. I plan to write more about this because it is recent history – the history that led to 9/11 in fact, and followed directly the “Civil Rights movement” but this history is either just ignored or lied about by the Left because they hate and fear “Evangelicals” more than anything, because Evangelicals contested for social power, were winning on many, many fronts, and then – from their perspective – literally started a terrorist war against them.
If you weren’t aware in the 80s and 90s, it is hard to realize just how significant some of those events were.
One of the reasons that the so-called “White Nationalist Movement” is such a failure is because it is an anti-American movement, even more than it is a pro-European movement. Just look at the list of authors for Counter Currents, it could very well be 80% European and 20% American, if that. And Greg Johnson, a stereotypical American who grew up in Georgia, hates America, as did Richard Spencer, as do the TRS people, etc. Not coincidentally, they are all anti-Christian and especially anti-“Evangelical.”
I contend that this isn’t a coincidence at all, nor are these “movement” people more “based Nietzschean.” It happened this way precisely because of how truly dangerous “Evangelicals” were to the power structure, so like after an airstrike on a road, you have half the people avoiding the crater by driving left and the other half avoided the crater by driving right.
Also, just a very basic reality that more secular people, like myself, tend to avoid mentioning is that those “Evangelicals” are the ones who have children, thus all they have to do is successfully pass the tradition on to their children and they win by default.
The Based Nietzschean Race First White Nationalists are able to say the right words but they have no idea how to create actual institutions. The very few – less than a handful – of times they were able to create institutions they did so by just copying Evangelical institutions by using different words and labels.
Which is fine, and good, because in a lot of ways you cannot create an institutions – there are really only two institutions in human society, everything else a variation on that.
LikeLike
I’m 34 (good guess on that one), from Michigan, grew up in a non-denominational church.
LikeLike
So I don’t have any idea what the 80s and 90s were like (young and sheltered via homeschooling) but I have pretty extensive experience with Evangelicals. My dad is a Qtard and has been saying the Rapture is going to happen this year my entire life, without the tiniest exaggeration.
LikeLike
> It is sort of like how the Pizzagate thing worked. Whatever crazy story – they were killing kids in the basement or whatever – obviously was not just false, but crazy.
Oh, were you not there to witness the #killroom post?
I was.
LikeLike
Interesting take on the pizzagate thing. I always wondered if the whole thing was to show a severely compromised individual how easy it was to weave a story and get people sniffing around like the Scooby Doo Mystery Gang.
With the result of getting all the skeezbags worked up enough to order the wonks to pass real laws and limit any sort of ground up power.
Post Trump, it’s obvious that an action is as much or more about rallying a response than it is the actual action. It is the state’s immune system and these little events are the vaccine.
Can you imagine if the state started suspending bank accounts of anyone participating in Juggalo gatherings? Joke’s on them. No bank accounts!
LikeLike
> No bank accounts!
They’re sawing off the branch they’re sitting on. No one competent would go after bank accounts. I certainly wouldn’t. You can never put that toothpaste back in the tube.
LikeLike
Agreed, I expected better from TPTB. They’re making more unforced errors than I expect.
LikeLike
Agreed, I expected better from TPTB. They’re making unforced errors.
LikeLike