I’ve come to a better understanding of just what the Democratic party is and how it operates. This, in turn, has lead me to a better understanding of its side-kick, the Republican party.

The Democratic party is essentially as old as the United States itself, in fact, it is the oldest currently active political party in the world. Originally the Democratic-Republican party, founded by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, it was remade several times, and in the modern era has come to be the major political force in American politics.

The Democratic party itself is surrounded by a large para-party, a network of think tanks, NGO’s, faculty lounges, activists groups, and non-profits like Planned Parenthood. These are all essentially extensions of the Democratic party itself. We also see that many of the Republican politicians are themselves crypto-Democrats, and this became more visible during the Presidency of Donald Trump.

We’re back to a two-party system, the Democratic-Republican party of Barack Obama and George W. Bush, and the MAGA Party, the personal party of Donald Trump.

Once you understand how Democrats and crypto-Democrats speak, it is easy to understand the hysteria promoted in pieces like Joanthan Chait’s “Anybody Fighting Joe Biden Is Helping Trump’s Next Coup All Republican politics is now functionally authoritarian” in New York magazine.

There are two styles of Democratic partisan writing. The first is “comfort food” that is especially popular when Democrats have a minority in Congress. Thomas Frank, David Brooks and Michael Moore are examples of this genre. The other is “fear porn,” as Chait’s article exemplifies.

For a partisan Democrat, a Democrat losing an election is a “failure of democracy.” For a Republican to oppose a Democratic party program is “obstructionism” and for a Republican to attempt to govern is “politicizing government.”

It is important to understand how the American Left, which is simply the army of crypto-Democrats not officially employed by the party, uses the related terms “authoritarian” and “fascist.”

A “fascist” is a working or middle class white person who is not Jewish and has non-leftist political and social values. Thus, when these people get engaged in politics, that is “authoritarianism” or “fascism.” A middle class or wealthy white person who is not Jewish and has leftist political and social values are “not fascist” and “not authoritarian” and may be described as a “liberal,” a “progressive,” or a “moderate.”

It was of course the 1960’s Cultural Revolution that shaped the modern Democratic party and the Left generally. The Democratic party’s demonization of the white American working class is a byproduct of the Left’s Jewish leadership. When the American Jewish Committee published its landmark book, The Authoritarian Personality, it mainstreamed what was up until then an extremely radical form of post-Marxist Jewish Leftism, called “Critical Theory” – an early permutation of what is now called “Critical Race Theory.”

Thus, you can see the concept of “fascist” is merely a generalization of the traditional Jewish demonization of the goyim – a non-Jewish person of European ancestry. Before the 20th century, these people would simply be referred to as “Christians.”

It is impossible to overstate the influence of the book, The Authoritarian Personality, on modern American politics.

Though strongly criticized for bias and methodology, the book was highly influential in American social sciences, particularly in the first decade after its publication: “No volume published since the war in the field of social psychology has had a greater impact on the direction of the actual empirical work being carried on in the universities today.”

It is also important to note that the entire purpose of the book and its publishing by the American Jewish Committee was to give a psuedo-scientific basis for the demonization of goyim.

Some observers have criticized what they saw as a strongly politicized agenda to The Authoritarian Personality. Social critic Christopher Lasch argued that by equating mental health with left-wing politics and associating right-wing politics with an invented “authoritarian” pathology, the book’s goal was to eliminate antisemitism by “subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective psychotherapy—by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum”

When reading Democratic party propaganda – and the entire written output of the American Left is nothing more than Democratic partisan propaganda – all of the various smear terms, “fascist,” “far-right,” and “authoritarian” are simply variations on the term “goyim”, the Hebrew word for nation that has developed into an all-purpose slur for non-Jewish people. In modern Democratic party propaganda, “fascism” has no other intellectual content than “goyim engaged in politics.”

Thus, the concept of “Antifascism” is simply a rebranding of “anti-goyim,” or an early version, “anti-Christian.” “Antifascism” is the ruling political tactic of the Democratic party, it is a Jewish-led coalition with the goal of preventing “goys” from attaining political power or even engaging in politics.

Thus, for the last five years, a typical working class white family, with a Christian background, a husband and wife and their children, who have some socially conservative views and voted for Donald Trump, are declared “fascists.” Antifascism asserts that “fascists” should not be allowed civil rights, thus “deplatforming fascism” is an all purpose concept to deny the freedom of speech of “goyim.”

Antifascism was the broader ideology of the Soviet Union and was always a popular front led by the Communist party:

Anti-fascist movements emerged first in Italy during the rise of Benito Mussolini, but they soon spread to other European countries and then globally. In the early period, Communist, socialist, anarchist and Christian workers and intellectuals were involved. Until 1928, the period of the United front, there was significant collaboration between the Communists and non-Communist anti-fascists.

In 1928, the Comintern instituted its ultra-left Third Period policies, ending co-operation with other left groups, and denouncing social democrats as “social fascists”. From 1934 until the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, the Communists pursued a Popular Front approach, of building broad-based coalitions with liberal and even conservative anti-fascists. As fascism consolidated its power, and especially during World War II, anti-fascism largely took the form of partisan or resistance movements.

The best way to understand the rise of the Democratic party’s new “Antifascist” ideology is the novel, The Plot Against America, written by the Zionist Jew Philip Roth. Roth, widely celebrated by the Jewish community in America, was viciously anti-goyim and particularly misogynistic against goyim women, whom he referred to by the racist slur “shiksa,” a Yiddish term meaning “unclean meat.” Roth viewed the American goyim as inherently “fascist,” and his book – like Joanthan Chait’s article – is fear porn.

Roth presents an alternative history of America, where Charles Lindberg becomes President, the American First Committee keeps America out of World War II, and the goyim create a “fascist” government to oppress Jews.

Roth stated that the idea for the novel came to him while he was reading the unpublished galleys for Arthur Schlesinger Jr.’s autobiography in which Schlesinger makes a comment that some of the day’s more radical Republican senators wanted Lindbergh to run against Roosevelt. The title appears to be taken from that of a communist pamphlet published in support of the campaign against Burton K. Wheeler’s re-election to the US Senate in 1946

The novel is told from the point of view of Roth as a child growing up in Newark, New Jersey, as the younger son of Herman and Bess Roth. It begins with aviation hero Charles Lindbergh, who is already criticized for his praise of Hitler’s government, joining the America First Party. As the party’s spokesman, he speaks against US intervention in World War II and openly criticizes the “Jewish race” for trying to force US involvement. After making a surprise appearance on the last night of the 1940 Republican National Convention, he is nominated as the Republican Party’s candidate for president.

What Roth fears is Jews assimilating.

A new government program, the Office of American Absorption (OAA), begins to take Jewish boys to spend a period of time living with exchange families in the South and Midwest to “Americanize” them. Philip’s older brother Sandy is one of the boys selected, and after spending time on a farm in Kentucky under the OAA’s “Just Folks” scheme, he comes home showing contempt for his family, calling them “ghetto Jews.”

For Roth, and the politically active Jewish community, “fascism” is when the goyim elect somewhat they do not approve of, and Jewish ethnic hatred for American goyim is expressed via fear that the American goyim are “fascist” and “authoritarian” at heart, and any political movement by them is a threat to Jews.

Since the Democratic party in financed by Jewish billionaries like Michael Bloomberg and Tom Steyer, and due to Jewish nepotism and anti-white and anti-Asian discrimination in the Ivy Leagues and other elite universities, academia is completely controlled by the Left, the Left’s understanding of America is that Jewish understanding of Jewish writers like Roth; Americans are goyim who cannot be trusted with political power because they are fascists always intent on assimilating Jews.

Donald Trump proved quite popular with the American goyim, therefore he is a “fascist” and an “authoritarian.” Despite Trump’s roots in the Jewish community – his political campaigns were completely funded by Zionist Jews like Sheldon Adelson – and despite his Jewish family and radical Zionism – Trump is a “Hitler” type character because he is popular among the goyim.

There is no substance to Democratic party propaganda. Ideologies like “liberalism” or “progressivism” or “socialism” are simply glittering generalities, just as terms like “fascist” or “authoritarian” are merely racial and ethnic slurs for anyone the Democratic party opposes.

One merely needs to read The Authoritarian Personality and related Critical Theory writing to understand these are not ideologies, these are the political expressions of Jewish racial bigotry against American goyim thinly veiled by political rhetoric.