Most of this had leaked out occasionally over the last twenty-five years, but it is interesting to see it all put together in one place. The pictures tell the tale. The “birth certificate” thing is explained, as is Obama’s cover backstory.
As I’ve been writing for ten years now, CIA was always “liberal” – even “leftist” – despite the fact that most of the 60’s through 80’s critics of CIA always characterized it as “right-wing.” But then again, most of those “CIA critics” were themselves “former” CIA and often just a sort of limited hangout.
Considering that CIA’s predecessor was set up by the FDR administration and Britain’s MI6, it shouldn’t be a surprise. What also shouldn’t be a surprise is the fashionable leftist liberalism that was so popular among Anglo elites. The 60’s “radicals” were elites themselves and the 60’s Cultural Revolution an elite project to undermine the more conservative elites from the generation prior, especially the isolationist and immigration restrictionist elites that were not enthusiastic about the World Wars.
Apparently, her CIA parents liked to hang around radical Black Panther types, and couldn’t have been surprised he impregnated her. So he apparently paid the African guy to marry her and pretend to be the father to make it look respectable. But then Obama’s mamma basically became a swallow – a sex spy – for CIA, bedding and marrying various African and Southeast Asian men and recruiting anti-Communist assets in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Africa.
Obama was groomed by the wealthy, leftist elite of the Democratic party starting when he was a child. He barely attended Columbia because he was globe-trotting for CIA.
This seems to explain why the Bush family and the Obama family seemed frankly on the same side. Obama drone bombed more Muslims than Bush did, and no one could complain because that would be “racist.”
This also should cause many people to adjust our understanding of just what CIA, and the broader intelligence community, and the unofficial “Deep State” network, is actually like. It’s more like the radical social revolutionaries of the early Soviet Union than it is the Stalin-era KGB.
Panetta’s and Obama’s speeches to CIA 12 years ago really comes across quite different in hindsight. Remember, the Republicans were telling us that Obama was some sort of Egyptian Brotherhood agent and a peacenik that would destroy our military and be weak on Al Qaeda. The Democrats gave Obama a Peace Prize the day before he started his Drone War.
I love how Panetta assure everyone that Obama isn’t going to “punish” anyone for the “mistakes” of the past. So, business as usual.
It’s frankly comical and even funnier in hindsight.

Reblogged this on Vermont Folk Troth.
LikeLike
I had to revisit your excellent Merrick Garland articles tonight…Are they only trying to use state intimidation to keep white people from participating in local democracy and schools or are they really going for it now?
LikeLike
Any thoughts, William Barr?
Sessions, are you still alive?
LikeLike
@Whitey
They are really going for it. They have to drive all opposition out of public spaces so the next election doesn’t have any “optics” problems.
LikeLike
The best evidence that Obama Sr. is indeed Barack’s father is to look at his half-siblings, particularly George Obama. To my eyes George resembles Barack and shares some of his effeminate mannerisms and general insouciance: https://youtu.be/M0XIBCGbtRU?t=1779
LikeLike
@John Morlar
Eh, I don’t see it. The brother looks – and sounds – like a typical African and doesn’t seem particularly effeminate to me. I do agree that Obama does at times.
I really don’t see the resemblance. Not that I have a particularly strong opinion either way, I always thought Donald Trump’s and the Republican’s Birth Certificate Conspiracy Theories were dumb. It was all just an Israeli campaign to pressure Obama to not make the Iran deal that Likud didn’t want – hence, the major propaganda came from the Israeli Orly Taitz, the “Birther Queen.”
LikeLike
The fourth paragraph contains the pronoun ‘her’, with no antecedent noun; unless the reader already knows who ‘her’ refers to, there will be confusion. Not good writing.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Muunyayo .
LikeLike
> As I’ve been writing for ten years now, CIA was always “liberal”
> Considering that CIA’s predecessor
> a swallow – a sex spy – for CIA
> he was globe-trotting for CIA.
> of just what CIA, and the
> Panetta’s and Obama’s speeches to CIA
This is incidental to your point, but I believe “CIA” (and “FBI”, “DOJ”, etc.) when addressed without the “the” reifies the corporate aspect of the entity, whereas we must reify the agentic aspect if in no other than a spirit of defiance. Notice also that corporate names are legally spelled with all-caps like GOOGLE LLC, CITADEL LLC, and ENRON CORP. I strongly encourage everyone to reject these neologisms and revert to the civilized way of referring to these… entities.
LikeLike
I think Alex Jones also has a CIA background (his uncle).
Hence him becoming the designated conspiracy theorist.
LikeLike
@guest
It’s pure speculation based on circumstantial evidence, and the rumors tend to be on low quality sites, but I wouldn’t be surprised if Alex Jones is related to Stratfor, the “private intelligence” aka “propaganda” firm founded by Zionist George Friedman. Stratfor and Alex Jones got their start at the same time in the same place and you can see Jones as broadcasting “populist” style propaganda that fits the narratives Stratfor puts out.
LikeLike
Alex Jones once disparaged the CIA as, quote, “a low-level criminal organization,” and says similar things on a semi-regular basis. He’s repeatedly spoken about how his daddy scored top scores for math or whatever in the state of Texas and was recruited by the Rockefeller network to work in a top-shelf compartmented biomed lab. He’s also mentioned how he’s had top-level people in the top agencies, departments, etc. Generally speaking, his track record is insane. His familial background is nearly as spooky as Obama’s, and he looks ten years older than his claimed age, but I think it’s reasonably fair to characterize him as a rogue actor. I’m not sure he was ever a “designated conspiracy theorist”. He’s definitely never had any institutional support and seems to owe his success entirely to his oral charisma. Did you ever see the video of him ranting about guns (“Hitler took the guns! Stalin took the guns! Mao took the guns!”) with Piers Morgan? If you watch closely you’ll see Piers go for multiple minutes into what appears to be practically a hypnotic trance. I don’t think anyone else could do that to Piers and I don’t anyone else ever has.
Entertainment without equal. Highly recommended.
LikeLike