Supposedly, the term “conspiracy theory” was invented by the CIA to attack doubters of the conclusions in the Warren Report about the assassination of President Kennedy. The targets were people who posited a “wider conspiracy.”
Of course, “conspiracy” is a legal concept, something that people are convicted of every day. A “conspiracy” is simply two or more people “conspiring” together to commit some crime or nefarious act. So, a “conspiracy theory” is simply a theory that there exists a conspiracy among two or more people to commit a illegal or nefarious act.
Growing up at the tail end of the Cold War, a lot of literature, especially that inspired by the John Birch Society, talked about a “Communist Conspiracy” of which the United Nations was a major part.
Infamously, President George H. W. Bush, on September 11, 1990, used the phrase “New World Order” that inspired the “NWO Conspiracy theory.”
We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective — a new world order — can emerge: a new era — freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, East and West, North and South, can prosper and live in harmony.
There is a lot of talk, pro and con, about “globalism.” In fact, “globalism” is the ruling ideology of the West, both North America and Europe. The League of Nations was a sincere attempt at a “world government” and later, so was the United Nations. Yet, it’s hard to see the United Nations as having any power whatsoever; despite the headquarters being in New York City, the United States simply ignores the United Nations whever it feels like it, and so does every other government.
For all the “conspiracy theories” and the “official” plans for “free trade,” “globalism” is as old as time. It is simply a polite rebranding for “imperialism.” Many political speeches about “globalism” sound like something Alexander the Great would have said.
For all his faults, E. Michael Jones is to be credited for bringing the concept of “usury” back into the consciousness of some. Jones calls capitalism “state sponsored usury” which is a good description. “Ususry” has been attacked, in one form or another, by virtually every religion on the planet. But critiques of “capitalism” have typically come from the left, specifically the Communist movement, and the “cure” has typically always been worse than the disease. Indeed, the Communist movement was itself imperialist.
This USA Today article purports to debunk a “Covid Conspiracy theory” about Covid-19 being some sort of “conspiracy” by the Rockefellers – the Rockefeller family, in conspiracy lore, being the American version of the Rothschilds, the supposed family ultimately “at the top” of power, the “secret government,” the “deep state.”
“The claim was posted to the Facebook page for Exposing Satanic World Government, the social media arm of Global Watchmen News.”
It takes ten paragraphs of debunking dross like this until USA Today acknowledges that the core of the “conspiracy theory” is true:
the planning report released by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development,” includes a section called “Lock Step.” The report describes a series of scenarios — including a pandemic — in which technology could be used to help to restore humanity.
“The Rockefeller Foundation believes that in order to understand the many ways in which technology will impact international development in the future, we must first broaden and deepen our individual and collective understanding of the range of possibilities. This report, and the project upon which it is based, is one attempt to do that,” reads an excerpt from the report.
The “Lock Step” section outlines a scenario of authoritarian control in the wake of a hypothetical novel influenza pandemic similar to COVID-19. “Lock Step” envisions “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback,” according to the report. In this world, 20% of the global population was infected with the novel virus and 8 million people were killed in seven months. One excerpt is eerily reminiscent of the ongoing novel coronavirus pandemic: “The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols.”
Similar to the “debunking” of the Event 21 “conspiracy theory” we see at the core is something quite real.
Carroll Quigley, in his opus Tragedy and Hope said that various factions of “the elite” – meaning, very wealthy private interests and their partners in governments in the West, had a plan to use Central Banks as a form of world government. These Central Banks could coerce the official governments of the world via indirect manipulation of their currencies. Indeed, “bond vigilantes” are a daily topic of conversation in the financial press, and their actions are virtually exactly as Quigley described. They are a key feature of the Central Banks network.
Perhaps to understand the “conspiracy theories” and the realities behind them we can use a simple illustration.
When little Johnny or Sally walk in on Mommy and Daddy loving each other very much, they aren’t sure what is going on, so they interpret what they see in ways they can understand. Mommy and Daddy are “wrestling.” Sometimes Daddy is “hurting” Mommy because she is moaning.
If you walked in on a party where the female participants were dressed in “Sexy Devil” costumes and the attendees were tying each other up and whipping them – unless you understood the context you very well might call that “Satanic.” The infamous “Spirit Cooking” parties were, of course, symbolic cannibalism and had overt “Satanic” themes.
So when people described the participants as “Satanic Cannibals” they were hardly just making things up out of thin air, despite the reality not being “really cannibalism” and not “really Satanism.”
The Rockefeller report’s description about how the “elites” might react to a global pandemic, “Lockstep,” is indeed what we have seen during the Covid pandemic. Event 21, the “tabletop exercise” run by the World Heath Organization and the Gates Foundation, described exactly how events did later on turn out.
In his memoir, Rockefeller did “admit” that he wanted to help “coordinate” the governments of the world, and that there was nothing sinister about it, and in fact he was proud of it.
Every Empire has always announced they had the best of intentions and were the most moral people in the world. Of course they would say that. Every used car salesman says he is simply matching buyers with cars they can afford. Every BDSM performance purports to be “Safe, Sane and Consensual.”
Indeed, most rapists say the victim was “asking for it.” It wasn’t really “rape rape.”
Same with Covid. We saw the vitrolic attacks on the handful of governments, such as Sweden and Belarus, that did not go along with the other governments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_government_response_to_the_COVID-19_pandemic
Banned Hipster 
What were the nurses thinking doing the dancing bit with the hopefully fake corpse? Wow.
In my line of work, injuries are common, and when it occurs we report to a designated ER nearby. One of the only silver linings of the plandemic, was that when I cracked my rib about 2 months into the plandemic, and had to go the newly empty ER, I was in and out in half an hour, x-rays and all, whereas pre-plandemic a typical ER visit was at the very least a 3 hour wait in a completely crowded waiting room, screaming children and other such pleasantries. Nurses in the classic sense, sweet and comforting, is long gone if it has ever existed. Nurses as I have experienced them many, many times, are really just glorified secretaries, the majority of which have “office ass”, a big unflattering fat ass from sitting and snacking all day and, unsurprisingly, have extremely negative attitudes. That same trip for the rib injury, as I waiting to be released. a woman was there too absolutely balling, very distraught, seemingly looking for help while groups of nurses walked right by her having a funny conversation laughing all the way, I will always remember that.
After 9/11 it was military worship, after the plandemic it’s nurse worship. When the plandemic kicked off our work orders quadrupled over night and for a month straight I was working 14 and a half hours alternating with next shift round the clock seven days a week doing back breaking work, in an extremely dirty environment, but it was essential. But there’s no honorable mention or worship for us, which is fine, I don’t expect any for doing my job, I also work for a bigtime union and we didn’t even consider going on strike. Then I heard constant news of nurses threatening to go on strike in the middle of a “deadly pandemic” for working 12 hour shifts because they were “overwhelmed”, so heroic! I caught something a few weeks before the official plandemic was announced, it was the fastest acting illness I ever had in that I felt completely fine going into work but by the end the day I could hardly move my body flu ached so badly but I was over it in a few days and didn’t think anything of it, just thought I had a mild flu but was surprised at the speed I got sick. I accidently spread it to my 90 year old grandma when I ran an errand for her who got over it in few days as well, she’s a real tough old bird. Another silver lining is that I haven’t been ill since that time a year and half later, I’ve never received the jerb and don’t plan on it, they’ll have to bag and drag me, my grandmother has but so far so good. Anywho, forgive my rambling, your great Bannedhipster.
LikeLike
@Black Label
Late 2019 an Asian woman sneezed as I walked past her in a hallway. Within six hours I could tell I was getting sick, by the next morning I had a serious flu. Another guy that was there said the same thing, same gal had sneezed on him, he was in his sixties and said he was sicker than he had ever been in his life.
As for the nurses, I’ve really never had any sort of bad experience, the last time I had to deal with them it was two nurses, both white, early 30’s, perfectly attractive in a “normal” sense, not like “hot” or anything, and they were both extremely professional and business-like.
I know EMT’s tend to develop a pretty hard core gallows humor, but they spend all day scraping auto accident victims off of the sidewalk, so I expect it to be a necessary part of the job.
So you’ve got these nurses, bored in an empty hospital, expressing gallows humor that just doesn’t translate too well on social media during a world-wide lockdown, police state, and economic crash.
Good point about the soldier-worship after 9/11. In New York, it was firefighter worship.
I swear to god this story is 100% true.
It’s maybe a month afterward, I’m sitting in a bar downtown “packing” a pack of cigarettes. Just then, a bunch of firefighters, in their outfits, walk into the bar. Everyone assumes I’m clapping for them, and the entire bar erupts in applause.
One firefighter looks at the other and says, “what did you do, Bill, pull out a ten dollar bill?”
LikeLike
Interested in your take on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp9YmTnYP90
It’s the infamous footage of firemen on 9/11 saying there were three explosions. The part that throws me is the guy on the right saying at 2:37 he saw a “black, very large airplane” going into the second building. Been entertaining the ‘no-plane’ theory for a while and this obviously contradicts it. Are they ‘actors’ as some suggest? Or maybe there were planes.
What still makes the whole thing unbelievable, setting aside the lack of footage at the Pentagon, the ‘oh, the plane in Pennsylvania disappeared because it flew into an old mine shaft’ nonsense, is the physics of the collapse at free fall speed and of course everyone’s favorite, Building 7.
LikeLike
@Adam Smith
You mention a lot of things there, but I certainly do not believe those guys are “actors.” I think they are saying what they saw. That doesn’t mean any more than that, they are saying what they saw. Everyone understands sometimes even eye-witness accounts are not always completely accurate, because your perceptions are often jumbled, especially when under stress.
The “no-plane” theory is kind of based on a significant cognitive dissonant trick. If what you saw on TV wasn’t an accurate representation of what actually happened, that still doesn’t mean “no planes.”
>oh, the plane in Pennsylvania disappeared because it flew into an old mine shaft’
That’s a new one for me, and I’ve read them all.
The fact that towers 1, 2 and 7 were controlled demolitions – that is pretty much confirmed at this point – only means that. They were controlled demolitions. That fact, by itself, doesn’t mean anything else about planes, etc.
I will write more about the eye-witnesses at the Pentagon I knew personally. I am firmly convinced that some sort of “aircraft” hit the Pentagon, and this was confirmed to me by an eyewitness no later than November 1, 2001, and I have no reason to believe they were lying, and plenty of reasons to believe they were telling the truth.
It’s frustrating as I’ve literally been writing all of this for ten years, but you know, they banned my blogs just before Epstein killed himself.
LikeLike
The flight path of the Pentagon ‘plane’ flying nearly horizontal to the ground at near top speed has been beat to death by pilots for being nearly impossible to pull off – especially by supposed amateurs who just got their private license with no commercial aviation experience. The lack of footage is damning as well. Some speculate it was a missile. As for why they targeted where they did, others think it was the Rumsfeld $2.4 trillion thing, but honestly the ‘destroy the evidence’ argument seems silly by the 2000s. Don’t they just have everything on digital backup? Anyway – many unanswered questions about five sided building from hell.
LikeLike
I just assume it was a drone/missile. To the average person watching from the ground they would just think “airplane.” Someone did a side-by-side of a 747 and a specific drone/missile they were using at the time and yeah, I couldn’t tell them apart flying overhead.
I have also had trouble with the theory about the $2.4 trillion thing. I think a far more likely explanation for the specific location of the attack is that it hit the Office of Naval Intelligence. From what I remember the official dead list was a super-majority Navy guys.
Then, of course, I’ve read that Building 7 was the largest CIA facility outside of Langley.
LikeLike
random comment about airplanes. at a bar in manhattan during a business meeting some fellow security consultants off-handedly told me that during an assessment of civilian aircraft collision avoidance systems, by “faking” transponder signals purporting to come from other aircraft, you could trick the automatic collision avoidance system to effectively remotely steer an aircraft. i don’t think they knew the significance of what they were saying in nyc, or if they were just bullshitting.
LikeLike