But eventually it all comes out. When it does, the same Hasbara crew will simply say it’s “old news” or it is “irrelevant” now and why do you talk about Israel so much?
Now, bring in David Pecker, Donald Trump’s “fixer” Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s “mentor” Roy Cohn, or for that matter Donald Trump’s son-in-law, the father of his grandchildren, Jared Kushner – his father Charles Kushner too – and what emerges is a pretty clear picture.
You could call it a “cabal” – if they were, say, White Anglo-Saxon Protestants. But since they are Ashkenazi Jews, calling them a “cabal” is an “anti-semitic conspiracy theory.”
Trump’s long-time political ally, David Pecker at AMI, the publisher of the National Enquirer, published a full magazine promoting the new Saudi leader, Mohammed Bin Salman, a close collaborator with Jared Kusher, and his new “reforms.”
Bin Salman’s rise to power was extraordinary – he locked his political rivals in a hotel, forced them to transfer their entire fortunes held overseas to bank accounts controlled by Bin Salman, and murdered those who resisted.
It was Trump’s ally David Pecker that tried to blackmail Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos with pictures of his penis he had sent to his mistress. Pecker’s AMI was quite explicit: either Bezos force the Washington Post to stop investigating the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, or the National Enquirer would publish his “dick pics” and his private text messages to his mistress.
Which they did – Bezos’ wife divorced him and the richest man in the world lost half of his fortune.
It would even come out that Trump’s crew was blackmailing celebrity Evangelical Jerry Falwell Jr., which earned them his endorsement, influential among Evangelical voters.
This whistleblower reported a call between Trump and the Saudi ruler, Mohammed bin Salman. He or she is said to have had ‘concerns’ about what was said on the call about the president’s son-in-law and adviser, Jared Kushner. Kushner himself is known to have a very close relationship with MBS. Cockburn has previously written that Kushner may have been what Cosmo would call an ‘oversharer’ when it came to MBS. Unfortunately, it’s claimed that what he was sharing was American secrets: information Kushner had requested from the CIA would (allegedly) be echoed back in US intercepts of calls between members of the Saudi royal family. One source said this was why Kushner lost his intelligence clearances for a while.
According to Cockburn’s source about the seven whistleblowers, there’s more. It is that Kushner (allegedly) gave the green light to MBS to arrest the dissident journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, who was later murdered and dismembered in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul. A second source tells Cockburn that this is true and adds a crucial twist to the story. This source claims that Turkish intelligence obtained an intercept of the call between Kushner and MBS. And President Erdogan used it to get Trump to roll over and pull American troops out of northern Syria before the Turks invaded.
Did the mass media cover any of this in Trump’s original impeachment trial?
Did the mass media – like the New York Times and the Washington Post – suggest that Donald Trump was an “agent” of Benjamin Netanyahu’s Israel?
No. Of course not. Instead the mass media – and the Democrats who impeached Trump – didn’t touch any of this, and instead pretended that Donald Trump was an “agent” of Putin’s Russia.
This writer is constantly annoyed at how Jared Kushner’s father has never been mentioned by the mainstream media despite being a really interesting guy.
For instance, it is Charles Kushner – Jared’s father – who got the visa for Golan Cipel, the Israeli gay lover of Jim “I Am A Gay American” McGreevy – who immediately put his gay lover in charge of the New Jersey Department of Homeland Security – right in the middle of that agency’s 9/11 investigation:
It’s frankly hard to figure out where Likud ends and Trumpworld begins. Is there a difference?
If this were a group of “Irish-Americans” with direct ties to the Irish government – and the IRA in Northern Ireland – the entire mass media would be discussing “the Irish Espionage scandal.”
But since these are Jewish people – not Irish people – and the foreign country is Israel – not Ireland – the mass media is silent.
Why? Clearly it is because the Irish control the media.
Instead, you’ll get this:
It covers the facts well enough, but they leave it to you to connect the dots and draw the obvious conclusions. They leave out the context.
Anyone foolish enough to mention the context will be fired from their job, smeared as an “anti-semite” and attacked by Antifa. Or have their sex tapes leaked, perhaps. Or wind up falling out of their canoe while boating in the Potomac.
Did the mass media ever use the words “Epstein” and “Israel” in the same sentence? What about the words “Ghislaine” and “Israel?”
But really – what is the point of even discussing politics if you ignore the most interesting stories? Because this one has everything.
It would make a hell of a James Bond thriller. It would make a hell of an erotic mystery like Eyes Wide Shut. It would make a Tom Clancy novel seem boring.
But it can’t be discussed, because, you know, we can’t be anti-semitic.