Everything they did to Muslims they will do to white Republicans.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Friday that Biden had tasked the director of national intelligence, in coordination with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, with compiling a comprehensive threat assessment on violent domestic extremism.
The White House will also have its National Security Council review policy to determine whether the government can better share information or take other steps to mitigate the threat. She said the review would be overseen by Joshua Geltzer, a former senior director for counterterrorism, along with current officials. “Clearly, more needs to be done,” Psaki said.
Joshua Geltzer, a Zionist Jew, is a “counter-terrorism” official from the Obama administration. He is being hired by the Biden administration to go after American “police officers and firefighters, Realtors and bartenders, even public officials” that are Republicans who voted for Trump and he labels “far-right.”
Joshua Geltzer has spent his entire career engaging in hate-mongering against Muslims and “whites” both. Much of his career has been proposing “counterterrorism” tactics against the Muslim population of Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon – all enemies of Israel. At the same time, Geltzer has engaged in the same racist hate-mongering against Americans – those he labels as “white” … but not “Jewish” … and advocates using the same “counterterrorism” tactics against them.
We can see that in foreign policy, the Zionst Jew Joshua Geltzer attacks the perceived enemies of Israel and Jews, and in domestic policy, he attacks the perceived domestic enemies of Israel and Jews. Geltzer uses the same racist smear terms against both Muslims and “whites” – “far-right,” “extremists,” “violent” etc.
Needless to say Geltzer does not use any of these loaded smear terms for Jews, nor Israelis.
It should also be noted that Geltzer was a key figure in the attacks on General Michael Flynn over the “Russiagate” scandal. As should be obvious by now, this is the typical Zionist strategy – Geltzer only targeted Trump officials who are not Jewish. The Trump officials who are Jewish do not get attacked by Jews “on the other side.”
There is no need to impute a racist and sectarian motivation on Geltzer’s part, as it is quite apparent by his own actions and terminology.
And far from being a member of some fringe group of cranks, Geltzer is a member of the highest levels of the American establishment, with tenure at George Washington University, published in the most popular periodicals, appearances before Congress and is a lifetime member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Donald Trump voters are about to find out what it is like to be a Palestinian under a Zionist-occupied government.
Banned Hipster 
Reblogged this on Vermont Folk Troth.
LikeLike
Biden just fired Michael Ellis, so you were wrong again.
And since your interest in William Burns was piqued, perhaps you saw what Likud had to say about his horrible crime of affording fair treatment to the Palestinians in 2001?
He also was opposed to the Iraq War and may have assisted the Iraq Study Group, the importance of which you are well aware.
I’d also recommend you read up on what happened to James Lemurier in Turkey after the alleged Baghdadi raid and to Ayatollah Mike D Andrea. The Americans got somebody important, alright, but it probably wasn’t Baghdadi, who probably never existed.
There has been a significant shift in power in America, but it’s veiled in shadow as it’s been the culmination of a shadow war. Of course, that doesn’t mean blood has not been spilled…just ask Jeffery Epstein or Ayatollah Mike.
LikeLike
OK Apollonius, go ahead. Explain the raid to us. Who did they get?
No need to be cryptic.
LikeLike
Of course, I must preface by saying that these are just educated speculations, but I believe them strongly, at this point.
The timing of the “Baghdadi” killing says it all, I think. It came just two weeks or so after Turkey moved against the Kurds in Northern Syria and forced the evacuation of the American garrisons there. It was reported dating back to Dec 2018 that Israel was very concerned about maintaining an American presence in that location because it was a strategic buffer against Iran and a launchin pad for the Zionist Kurdish proxies, and Israel had come to believe that Turkey would allow Iranian infiltration if they had control. When Trump announced the first “withdrawal” from Syria in Dec 2018, apparently Israel pressured both Erdogan and Trump to hold off, so it didn’t happen. Erdogan had lost his patience by Oct 2019, and he finally went ahead.
I believe that this provoked Israel to leak to the Americans the location of some high level Turkish commander in order to effect his assassination, which appears to have happened with “Baghdadi’s” death.
The location of the raid and the timing strongly suggest that it was some kind of retaliation against Turkey, probably by Israel. Israeli involvement is further suggested by the fact that the raid was launched from the air base in Iraqi Kurdistan, which the Solemani assassination was also launched from and to which multiple reports have connected Mossad involvement. Finally, it has been well-known for years that the ISIS psyop has been managed not by CIA or the Pentagon, but by the Mossad, as you yourself have noted with Rita Katz and SITE Intelligence. So, if the character of the “caliph” of the “Islamic State” is suddenly killed off, who would be responsible for making that all-important casting decision?
It would have to be Israel.
As for the implications of this and the connection to the shadow war I alluded to, that would be another long comment.
LikeLike
@Apollonius
Remember the Hood Incident in 2003 or so?
So what do you make of the “movements” in Syria the first day Biden was in office?
LikeLike
I had hardly thought about the Hood Event, but that is another interesting connection. That was when Erdogan had just become prime minister and long before he was president. Turkey was very different then, and the power relations have undergone tectonic shifts, especially since the 2016 coup, which seems to have decisively moved Erdogan out of the Zio-American sphere of influence and much closer to Russia.
There was always a pro-Western faction in Turkey since the days of Ataturk (usually termed “Atlanticists”), and it was continually in conflict with the “Eurasianist” faction, which waxed and waned in strength at different periods. The infamous Turkish Deep State was entirely composed of Atlanticists.
As for Erdogan, one could write a volume about his career, which has been truly fascinating, and he has definitely proven himself one of the most resilient and impressive world political figures of this century. Long story short, he seems to have been running a long con against the Atlanticists for 20 years (not without getting plenty of blood on his own hands, mind you), and it all came to a head in 2016 when he brilliantly outwitted the core of the Turkish Deep State and smahed them utterly. They had appeared invincible since the 50s when Turkey joined NATO, but now, Turkey is on a totally different track.
Back in 2003, the Deep State was still calling the shots, but lost significant ground in part due to brazen overreach by their masters, as in the Hood Event or the Mavi Marmarra ship raid, all Zionist actions, either by America or Israel directly. We have seen over the past 20 years how this consistent behavior has ultimately doomed them both.
And 2016 was a pivotal, paradigm-shifting turning point. Erdogan has large ambitions, and his intentions to seriously oppose Israel, at least, are shown by the Blue Homeland Project in Libya and the Eastern Mediterranean. He probably doesn’t want direct conflict with America, but greater forces might compel him to make a clean break with NATO in the coming years. Antony Blinken just recently floated the threat of sanctions against Turkey, so this will be a live story for some time to come.
Turkey will be at the confluence of Russian, Chinese, and Iranian coordination in Eurasia, so what happens in Turkey will decide the future of the Eurasian Axis of Resistence. But, I’m betting Erdogan will come out on top; I think any honest observer would say he is a true survivor.
As for the recent movements in Syria, it doesn’t look like anything of much significance, but I would advise you to keep in mind the relevant fact the the bases in the Kurdish territories are probably aligned with Israel while the the Al-Tanf base in the southeast of Syria is controlled by the Pentagon more exclusively (CIA in Syria is probably ensconced there, as well.) The recent convoy was reinforcing the Kurdish bases, so I would watch whether Biden redistributes critical support from the northeast to southeast, as I believe would be likely in keeping with this general move against Israel that he indeed seems to be taking.
The convoy may have been a last-minute maneuver by Christopher Miller to shore up Israeli assets before he was tossed out. We’ll find out eventually.
LikeLike
@Apollonius
There seems to be an implication that Bliken is somehow at cross-purposes with Likud, or that he will make a move against Israel? That hardly seems in character with his entire career. Unless one accepts at face value the crazy talking point that “not nuking Iran is anti-semitic” I don’t see how Bliken is anything but a committed Israel-first Zionist. He was pushing more-or-less Likud policy under both Bush and Obama.
Plus the idea that Burns is some sort of White Shoe Anti-Semite, even an “Arabist,” seems quite exaggerated. Again, if NOT nuking Iran for Israel makes you an “anti-semite” well, how can one have a conversation with such people? Like the editor of the Atlanta Jewish News that advocated Mossad to assassinate President Obama because of how “anti-Israel” he was.
This is the same genre of kvetching as when an old Hassidic screams “anti-semite” at the chair he stubbed his toe on.
LikeLike
Well, I never said that any of these people were going to be “antisemites”. That’s just your typical bad faith reading of opinions you disagree with.
What I am saying is that Blinken is not really going to be in the driver’s seat of foreign policy, nor are any of the other Jews of his cabinet. Just go through the list yourself again, and consider how much of that is just the typical Washington affirmative action for Jews in domestic fiefdoms and how much is bona fide Zionist infiltration.
I mean, we have historical precedent now. What would you have said about Obama’s picks in his first year?
Rahm Emanuel, Ben Rhodes, David Axelrod, Ezekiel Emanuel, Wendy Sherman (!), Victoria Nuland (!), and several others. And yet, the Obama administration turned out to be genuinely resistant to Likud, as far it was possible under the circumstances.
Obama installed Hillary as Sec. of State because he was forced to, but he worked against her independence at the State Department for years before he was able to get rid of her.
And, William Burns has been explicitly described as an Arabist by other colleagues and observers, not just by me as an exaggeration. Perhaps his long experience in the State Department was the reason he was NOT Biden’s pick to run the department?
Maybe, he was chosen as CIA director precisely because that’s where the “real” State Department will be situated under a Biden Administration?
Look, this is nothing more than a simple internet discussion, and I’ve never convinced you of anything else before, but I’m just putting my ideas out there, for whatever they’re worth, because, why not?
I think big changes are in store, and my outlook for Biden is very optimistic. I believe and hope we will see a weaker Israel, a weaker Empire, and a stronger Europe/Eurasia four years from now.
Frankly, I think you are just so cynical that you are unable to perceive the reality of what is actually happening in the world much of the time. That is why your 2020 predictions were mostly wrong, and a cynical mentality will bring you to failure again and again.
But, of course, I could be wrong. At least I have my predictions on the record. If nothing else, I love being right, and, in that regard, 2020 was a very good year for me. I even won money betting on the election!
LikeLike
@Apollonius
I thought your comments on Syria and Turkey were quite informative.
“Blinken is not really going to be in the driver’s seat of foreign policy, nor are any of the other Jews of his cabinet”
Well then who is?
“consider how much of that is just the typical Washington affirmative action for Jews in domestic fiefdoms and how much is bona fide Zionist infiltration.”
Bliken has been pretty explicitly Zionist for his entire career. Washington affirmative action for Jews, ok fine, but nevertheless Bliken has been no slouch in the Zionist agenda department.
“the Obama administration turned out to be genuinely resistant to Likud, as far it was possible under the circumstances.”
Yes, true, but the “circumstances” that narrowed the possibilities were Rahm, Axelrod, Nuland, etc. Liberal Zionist fight with Likud Zionists all the time, it’s still Zionist infiltration.
“William Burns has been explicitly described as an Arabist by other colleagues and observers, not just by me as an exaggeration. Perhaps his long experience in the State Department was the reason he was NOT Biden’s pick to run the department?”
Fair enough. He does seem more “Arabist” than, say, Rahm Emmanuel. He did explicitly name drop James Baker which has been a kind of “signal” in these circles it seems.
“he was chosen as CIA director precisely because that’s where the “real” State Department will be situated under a Biden Administration?”
Yes, this seems likely – and a hopeful sign.
“your 2020 predictions were mostly wrong”
Eh – I predicted Trump would win narrowly, instead Biden won narrowly. In the swing states it was a matter of less than 50,000 votes. I don’t consider that wildly wrong or anything.
If anything, I wasn’t cynical enough – I did not forsee the Transition Integrity Project, with assistance from the entire Fortune 500 and the Silicon Valley oligarchy, coming down so hard on the Trump voters.
We can agree that a weaker Israel will be a good development.
LikeLike
@Apollonius
Also for the record I agree with your take on Erdogan. I’ve quasi-followed Turkey ever since they set Gulen up in Pennsylvania in the late 90’s.
Although the diaspora Turks I have met – all secular “Atlanticists” per your definition – think he’s a religious hypocrite. I got the impression they think of him the way Americans liberals thought of George W. Bush.
LikeLike
Interesting and enlightening dialogue. Much appreciated.
LikeLike
Haha yes, Erdogan is a devout Muslim in the same way that Stalin was an Orthodox Christian. Nevertheless, he seems driven by a greater vision…not one I’d agree with, but sometimes, Destiny puts men like him in important roles to change the world. Again, not unlike Stalin. Suffice it to say, I don’t see Erdogan as the unsophisticated “tin-pot, kleptocrat, thug” caricature he is painted as in liberal press.
“Well, then who is [going to be in the driver’s seat]?”
I suppose it is likely going to be a reprise of the Obama dynamic–namely, that the foreign policy power will be split between the State Department and other networks, formal and informal, centered around the CIA and Pentagon. William Burns is going to be the primary counterbalance to Blinken, which is why I’m not so alarmed by him, even though I don’t really disagree with you that he is a defender of Israel (albeit on the liberal wing of Zionism).
I am confident that the Iran Deal will be restored and that a serious backlash against Saudi may even be in the cards. After all the outrageous excesses that Trump unleashed, there must surely be a lot of pressure for some payback by some very important people. I mean, do you seriously think that the CIA is just gonna let the Khashoggi incident go as water under the bridge?
Blinken will have to make some big concessions. I expect some resistance, but things are tilted against Israel now, so the odds look good to me. Of course, I’m not expecting miracles, but Biden is in a position to deliver just enough of a lifeline that would be good for humanity at this point in history. It is still going to be a long road ahead, regardless of what happens.
As for the Transition Integrity Project and the Big Tech and Wall Street proscriptions, I honestly think it’s been so overblown. As silly as it might sound to you, I don’t think there was any fraud in the election, so these assorted organizations are not so big or bad to me as they seem to you.
I mean, doesn’t it make you feel just a bit foolish to be constantly whining about about a bunch of nerds in San Francisco ruining everything?
Are they really that powerful (at least in comparison to other, more traditional factions)?
That would be a whole separate discussion, I guess, but I’d be glad to have it. I don’t like them either, btw, but I do not take them that seriously.
LikeLike
Discipline or Destroy the GOP.
LikeLike
yes, the Trumpchumps and Republiscams are
going to get it….and whatever “it” is, they
deserve every bit of it. The sooner the Trumpchumps
go WN, the sooner the Republiscam pty goes extinct,
the better.
LikeLike
Also, as if on cue, I saw this:
I don’t want to read too much into it, but pointing out Michael Flynn and the UAE as “don’ts” for the whole intelligence community is a pretty suggestive signal. And why even write an article like this? In the NYT?
LikeLike
Oh my, I must be getting annoying by now, but I just saw this and have to throw it in, as well, which I wasn’t expecting to see.
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-world-news-israel-united-nations-a5f546bf188f808ba29f381d76d44729
Haha, my timing is just perfect, isn’t it?
LikeLike
LOL
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-proudboys-leader/exclusive-proud-boys-leader-was-prolific-informer-for-law-enforcement-idUSKBN29W1PE
I’m sorry, but the news today is just too good.
And to top it all off, it’s Holocaust Remembrance Day!
It’s simply perfect.
LikeLike