They say why harp on Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell? Sure it’s obviously wrong, but it’s just tabloid sex scandal stuff. There is no systemic issue – the only people who say so are radical feminists, and they are crazy.
Rudolph Giuliani, former New York mayor, former “America’s Mayor,” “Mr. 9/11,” one time Republican presidential candidate, and now Trump’s political proxy, supposedly fell for a “Borat” scam, where the Zionist Jew comedian and spokesman for the Anti-Defamation League filmed him on video in a potentially compromising position.
In the film, released on Friday, the former New York mayor and current personal attorney to Donald Trump is seen reaching into his trousers and apparently touching his genitals while reclining on a bed in the presence of the actor playing Borat’s daughter, who is posing as a TV journalist.
Following an obsequious interview for a fake conservative news programme, the pair retreat at her suggestion for a drink to the bedroom of a hotel suite, which is rigged with concealed cameras. After she removes his microphone,
Giuliani, 76, can be seen lying back on the bed, fiddling with his untucked shirt and reaching into his trousers. They are then interrupted by Borat who runs in and says: “She’s 15. She’s too old for you.” Representatives for Giuliani have not replied to the Guardian’s requests for comment.
Giuliani explains is this way:
“This guy comes running in, wearing a crazy, what I would say was a pink transgender outfit,” Giuliani told the New York Post. “It was a pink bikini, with lace, underneath a translucent mesh top, it looked absurd. He had the beard, bare legs, and wasn’t what I would call distractingly attractive. “This person comes in yelling and screaming, and I thought this must be a scam or a shakedown, so I reported it to the police. He then ran away,” Giuliani said. The police found no crime had been committed. Giuliani continued: “I only later realised it must have been Sacha Baron Cohen. I thought about all the people he previously fooled and I felt good about myself because he didn’t get me.”
What “Borat” want you to believe is that Giuliani was easily played the fool by a good looking 24 year old posing as a conservative news host and right-wing groupie, and that Giuliani went to her hotel room and was unzipping his pants when Cohen bursts in to play the part of Chris Hansen.
What Giuliani wants you to believe is that he fell for the fawning conservative TV host act, but he only went to her hotel room to do more of the interview, and perhaps some close up shots.
Consider if it’s actually more forgivable for an old man used to the groupies attracted to any type of fame to fall for a 24 year old’s come-ons, than it is for a seasoned political player, one who has spent decades in the public spotlight, to fall for such a set up based on seemingly little more than an unknown “conservative media host and channel.”
It’s Borat, and everyone laughs at Borat, but Borat’s real name is Sacha Baron Cohen. He is a celebrity spokesman for the Anti-Defamation League of B’Nai Brith, the mostful power Zionist Jew lobby in United States domestic politics, and has famously called for the abrogation of the free speech of anyone the Anti-Defamation League says – specifically, Cohen has attacked the speech of Europeans, Americans, and Palestinians.
I know, it’s a trip that Sacha Baron Cohen, who has made his entire career off of racist jokes, smears, and stereotypes of everyone Jews like him hate: Palestinians, Arabs, Eastern European Christians, conservatives, Republicans, small-town Americans … even Austrians – cause, you know, Hitler – is going to lecture people on “hate speech” and demand that Google, Twitter, and Facebook ban anyone the ADL tells them too, but there it is.
Cohen is going to lecture America about their “racism” while they all laugh at his racist jokes.
What does it say that Rudy Giuliani, seemingly a top level political player and political proxy for the President of the United States, is so easily set up in a potentially embarrassing situation?
What if Giuliani really did have sex with the fake news anchor, in a room rigged for video and sound? What if she really was underage?
Instead of the film released so the public can laugh at Giuliani being played the fool, what if the video had instead been presented to Giuliani as potential blackmail material, to be kept forever secret as long as Giuliani played ball?
Giuliani, Hunter Biden, Hillary’s insecure emails, John Podesta clicking on a email fishing link – you might think there would be some sort of security infrastructure in place. Surely Giuliani has bodyguards of some type – surely he has someone he can call.
Yet time and time again, our politicians, our “elites” our leaders are so hungry for publicity anyone with a camera can set them up in potentially extremely compromising situations.
This is not a serious country.
However, it is a most serious Empire. You don’t rule the world by being stupid and insecure.
So, clearly, Giuliani is not a real power-broker.
They say that JFK was a rampant womanizer, but he “got away with it” because the newspapers back in those days were “discreet.”
The power of the media is such that even if you were a boy scout, if you never even so much as looked at another woman – if you followed the “Pence rule” to the letter, they could always just make something up. They could even doctor up some “deep fakes” these days.
So it appears it’s the media that is the sovereign.
Of course any fool with a camera can make media. It’s actually the distribution of the media that matters. Hence, the story of Biden’s laptop was literally suppressed, in real time, by all the major “social” media properties: Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc. Wikipedia has already declared the entire story of Biden’s laptop a “debunked far-right conspiracy theory.”
It’s a “conspiracy theory” and like “QAnon” it causes violence by remote control. Thus, it is acceptable to censor it.
But whatever Giuliani did on tape in that hotel room, that will likely see wide distribution by Facebook, Twitter, and Google.
Once we move to fully “online voting” it will be a lot easier for Facebook, Twitter, and Google. Why not just make the voting public, and anyone who votes for the losing side gets banned for conspiracy theories and hate speech?
Meanwhile, anyone saying vote for this team, or believe this issue, or this ideology is right – that is all rather meaningless because, as a commenter here pointed out, you aren’t even in the game. You don’t even realize there is a game being played.