The headline:
“Faculty resoundingly votes to change the name of Washington and Lee”
Established in 1749, one of the oldest universities in North America, founded by “Scots-Irish Presbyterian pioneers,” after the war Robert E. Lee served as the President and the university was renamed after those two most famous Virginians, Washington and Lee.
Now, in 2020, triggered by the death of a drugged-up felon who once pointed a gun at and threatened to shoot a pregnant woman and her unborn baby, George Floyd, a large majority of Washington and Lee’s faculty voted to change the university’s name because of “racism.”
How is this happening in 2020, in the era of Trump?
All one has to do is to listen to the rhetoric of a typical “Black Lives Matter” activist. The spiel goes something like this, “black people can’t walk down the street without our lives being in danger from racist cops.”
The problem with this statement is that it’s not just false, it’s absurdly false. All the statistics are well known. Black people are in no specific danger from police. On the contrary, it’s the excessive violence and crime of a specific segment of the American black population that sometimes results in harm from the police; typically, this is due to resisting arrest or outright trying to murder police.
The rhetoric broadcast by the media is a malicious reversal of reality. Black-on-white crime is endemic – it’s why so many urban cities have been abandoned by white people, because white people are so often the victim of black violence and crime. Blacks commit crime far, far out of proportion to their numbers. There is no epidemic of white-on-black crime, it’s quite the reverse: an epidemic of black-on-white crime.
Yet what does the media broadcast? White women, referred to by the racist mysoginist slur “Karens” occasionally attempting to enforce basic standards of civility or even just call the police when threatened by blacks.
It’s been this way for most of our lifetimes: black on white crime is ignored by the media, treated as a local matter, if it is covered at all. But even a mild negative expression by a white person against a black person is treated as if it’s a reintroduction of the Atlantic Slave trade.
At some level, blacks know this, but they are incentivized to play along.
Of course the source of this media narrative is not black people, but instead, people with skin as white as mine: Ashkenazi Jews. So many on the “right” want to downplay this, even deny it, but we all know it’s true. Because the false narrative of “whites oppressing blacks” is merely a sub-narrative of the larger narrative, which is “neo-Nazi Hilters oppressing innocent Jews.”
This narrative is even more absurd, so absurd it can only be called “gaslighting” as this recent media narrative from the UK clearly demonstrates:
“Neo-Nazis telling followers to ‘deliberately infect’ Jews and Muslims with coronavirus, report warns”
There is no difference between the “real news” and Hollywood fiction. There are no “neo-Nazis” in the West in 2020. The most famous “neo-Nazi” of 2020 is Andrew Anglin, who is quite open about not being a “neo-Nazi” but in fact a fictional character meant to troll the media. But the media finds it useful, so pretends that there are “real Neo-Nazis” when they know there are not.
The play-acting goes so far that the main American Jewish lobby, the Anti-Defamation League, still pretends that “thousands” of Jewish community centers were victims of “anti-semitic threats” when it’s admitted all the “threats” came from a Jew in Israel – the Jewish version of Jussie Smollet or the NASCAR Noose.
How does the typical redditor respond to this news?
Must be confusing being a Neo-Nazi. How are they expected to contract and spread a fake disease that’s entirely made up and it’s really 5G brain control waves but it’s just the flu? — swamprat70
So they know it’s fake. They know there are no “neo-Nazis” – instead, “neo-Nazi” is a code word for “Trump supporter” or “Brexit voter.” The audience is fully aware that there are no “neo-Nazis” – that it’s all fake – but play along because it’s useful politically.
The gaslighting is so persuasive that it reminds one of no less than the old Soviet war against “wreckers.” When the Soviet agriculture plans failed, it was blamed on “wreckers” – agents of the “capitalists” that were sneaking around destroying crops. Did anyone really believe it? Perhaps the very young, but no one else.
Another example: for most of my lifetime, occasionally people will speculate on “another Civil War.” Various times when political tensions were high, some people, often the right but sometimes the left, would muse about another American civil war. At some point in the last couple of years, on online right-wing websites, people might talk about “Civil War II.”
Then, just because it’s funny and rolls off the tongue, some wag called it: “Civil War II: Electric Boogaloo” after the absurd 1980s film about break-dancing.
So what does the media do? The media makes up, out of whole cloth, a “Boogaloo Movement” of “far-right Trump supporters” who are “planning another civil war.” Of course, these “far-right Trump supporters” are made up of one part “neo-Confederate Ku Klux Klansmen that want to reinstitute black slavery” and one part “neo-Nazis who want to gas Jews.”
They even made up a “uniform” for the “Boogaloo Boys” – Hawaiian shirts.
Aloha shirts.
Neo-Nazi KKKs dressed up like Hawaiian tourists, complete with leis, one suspects.
How can one even argue against such absurdity? Perhaps the absurdity is part of the gimmick, part of the strategy. One would think that some Black Lives Matter activist saying, “Neo-Nazi KKKs wearing Aloha shirts and leis have infiltrated the police unions and are committing violence against Black Bodies while planning on gassing Jews for Hitler” would elicit laughter, but Very Serious News Readers on all the mainstream TV stations repeat these talking points with the utmost sincerity.
Anyone remember the movie Airplane? The script for Airplane was taken, almost verbatim, from a very serious, albeit quite cheesy, film called Zero Hour!
Zero Hour was a “real” disaster film, but its script could be used with minimal changes for the parody, Airplane!
It’s a fitting allegory for the Current Year.
“Serious” history like the Jew Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States with its comic-book, professional wrestling version of history, Evil White Oppressors Vs. Noble Savage Peoples of Colors, can be ret-conned into the current year’s narrative of Boogaloo Boy Cops vs. Gentle Giants of Color George Floyds.
How can you even argue? The comedian Gavin McInnes started a multi-racial joke “fraternity” the Proud Boys with “hazing” rituals like eating breakfast cereals – and the fraternity was immediately ret-conned into a “white supremacist terrorist group.” What about all the black and brown Proud Boys? Well, they have “embraced white supremacy.”
How can you argue? Like trying to have a conversation with Leslie Neilsen, it’s just full-stop parody delivered in a dead pan tone of voice.
A couple of years ago there was the narrative of the “Covington Boys.” The entire mass media – including virtually the entire conservative, right-wing Republicans including the Trump-supporting faction, created an absurd narrative about a “privileged white boy” “smirking” at a “Native American Elder.”
For 48 hours or so, a five second clip without context was the lynchpin of a full-spectrum anti-white two-minute hate. When the rest of the video was released, when the “Native American elder” was exposed as a grifting fraud pretending to be a veteran, a quick clean-up job was done. Now, the “Black Hebrew Israelites” were blamed as the perps – because they are “anti-semitites” who “hate Jews” – and the entire thing was just swept under the rug, forgotten as quickly as it came.
Academia is in charge of the longer-term narratives, like the Howard Zinn book, and impressionable young people going to college get indoctrinated into the anti-white narrative. They don’t really have to internalize it as much as they simply know not to counter-signal it. Lip service is mostly fine, for now.
But you can always gain status points by pretending to truly believe the narrative. You can get some social media clout by pretending you saw a “Boogaloo Boy” attacking a woman-of-color or spotted a “Karen” calling the police on an innocent black man.
If you throw a metaphorical punch at the narrative, you find yourself hitting air, because it’s just a ghost, a shadow.
The summer of 2020 has seen an all-out assault on the entire history of the United States of America and the history of her native people. The core enemy?
Let’s be very frank: the core enemy is the people we now call “Scots-Irish” because they are the real founders of America. Second to them, “Scots-Irish-adjacent” are the English descendants of the Southerners, especially the planter class. Next in line are the German immigrants who assimilated and married into the earlier Americans. Even just 20 years ago, a Boston Irish-Catholic or a Brooklyn Italian could claim some “oppression points” for being the progeny of more recent immigrants, but that privilege is now gone in 2020 – the writing was on the wall 20 years ago when another Jew wrote the book “How the Irish Became White.”
The Civil War II is here, now, but it’s not going to be a Boogaloo, it’s a Cultural Civil War, fought via culture, media, art – and economics. The sides are evident, and skin color indeed is your uniform, but beware, there are many wearing the uniform that are in fact with the enemy, a fifth column.
Banned Hipster 
Outstanding post.
Here’s a side point that occurred to me about the farce you describe:
One enabler of the farce is the willingness of upper middle class people to accept the word of the New York Times (and its many amplifiers) as gospel.
They intellectually “know” this is a mistake even by their own standards…the Times cheered us into war in Iraq by promoting the “weapons of mass destruction” narrative, predicted a 99% certainty of a Hillary Clinton victory in 2016, etc.
But it’s exhausting to accept that the “news” of “what’s happening” in the world is just propaganda. And it’s considered “low status” to consider alternative sources, whether mainstream conservative news or alternative dissident blogs.
The result is that upper middle class liberals are barely even aware of non-New-York-Times-approved narratives. (To the extent they ARE aware of counter-narratives, it’s because they read about exaggerated cartoon versions of them…in the New York Times!)
You’d think that the Internet would have broadened everyone’s perspective, but no. Overwhelmed by choice, the upper middle class seems to have voluntarily blinkered itself, believing it high status to “believe” the right people.
In my various groups of friends, I’m the “badthinker,” (even though they don’t know the half of it). So I literally have people in my circles asking me about….”the boogaloo”!
They have so little exposure to unapproved ideas that the only thing they “know” about people in flyover country is that….they’re planning the boogaloo!
They are aware on some level that it’s farce, but they don’t have any reasonable substitute narratives.
And, as you say, the learned in college that “They don’t really have to internalize [the anti-white narrative] as much as they simply know not to counter-signal it.”
They’ve trained themselves not to question the mainstream media narrative, even in their own minds, lest they blurt out some low-status badthink by accident. Unfortunately, that self-training has made it easier for them to take farcical narratives semi-seriously.
LikeLike
@Charlie
A recent article on Unz I think explained that the quasi-elites, meaning, the upper-middle to upper-upper middle class, had been so gaslit by the “Russiagate” hoax they really, truly believed that “Putin’s agents” had “hacked” into the voting machines and “stole” the election for Trump.
Spreading this absurd conspiracy theory was high-status, and proved you knew “the real deal.”
The only thing comparable I can remember is back in the two years after 9/11. Virtually all conservatives, and at least half of the liberals, believed themselves to be very high-status by knowing all sorts of obscure and esoteric conspiracy theories about Islam.
The post-9/11 anti-Islam stuff worked great for both the right and the left. The conservatives could finally be “racist” against an out-group, Islam. The liberals could status-signal about Islam being “misogynist” and “homophobic.”
A perfect kosher sandwich. For the other half of the liberals, they could signal their cosmopolitanism by talking about their “Muslim friend” who was totally modern and not fundamentalist at all, and isn’t shawarma delicious?
You can’t overstate it: our “elites” are extremely low-information.
The feminist scholar Camille Paglia once pointed out that in her introductory classes, the fly-over country Bible-belt students are often easier to educate on the cultural history of art because at least they have the Bible, thus, a historical context from ancient times to the post-classical world.
The non-religious, the non-Christian kids? They have nothing. They literally believe that Martin Luther King and Gandhi fought with Abraham Lincoln to free the slaves and defeat Hitler.
Yet, these liberals – and their Conservative Inc. counter-parts, are convinced they are very, very well educated because of their freshman colonial studies class and critical race theory seminar.
No history, no art, no music, no anthropology. Just fact-free “Theory Studies,” and their right-wing technical counterparts only know some half-assed “libertarian” economic theory.
LikeLike
Hilarious quote! “The non-religious, the non-Christian kids? They have nothing. They literally believe that Martin Luther King and Gandhi fought with Abraham Lincoln to free the slaves and defeat Hitler.”
Two other thoughts: 1) “Believing” absurd things is a useful way to signal loyalty. Our elites do this consciously while our useful idiot quasi-elites ape the elites for status-signalling purposes.
Spandrell (quoting Unz) has a great post about this that I think you’ll like if you haven’t seen it:
https://spandrell.com/2015/06/03/the-purpose-of-absurdity/
2) One of the things that turned me into more of a populist was the recognition that, in spite of being an upper-middle-class quasi-elite myself, I have much more in common with the middle class than with the upper class.
Many of my quasi-elite peers mistakenly think of themselves as part of the elite. I want to say, “Did you give a million dollars to the Clinton foundation? Can you get legislation passed to help your business? No? Then you aren’t a member of the elite. Would you be offered a position of power in a One World Government? No? Then you’re a useful idiot if you want a borderless world.”
The upper middle class imagines itself to be wise and well-informed, when it’s anything but.
The upper middle class also mistakenly imagines itself to be elite and powerful. But in fact they are powerless tax donkeys being propagandized, used, and looted by the elites.
The failure of the upper middle class to identify with and stick up for their fellow Americans against rapacious elite looters reveals them to be stupid, venal, and self-deluding.
And that pushes me even further into identifying with the actual middle class. The hostile looting of America by the elites is bad enough. Seeing the misguided upper middle class actively CHEERING for the looters is almost as depressing, and makes it impossible for me to identify with them.
LikeLike
Regarding Whites: it´s definitively among the most depressing aspects for me that WHITES THEMSELVES support anti-whiteness. As I always say: it is WHITES that persecute Whites for being White. The idea that we are oppressed by non-Whites is embarrassingly stupid. If we Whites stood up and walked away, the whole affair is over… puff… gone… over with. Similar point regarding jews: how do 1-2% jews hold a gun to the head of 55% Whites? I.e. very important aspects are not discussed and not understood.
An important question arises: what is the reason that some Whites are NOT anti-white and some (many) Whites are anti-white? I.e. if we understood that, we might be able to increase the number of pro-White Whites.
I´m also totally unclear about how many Whites actually are in opposition to the establishment, i.e. in opposition to globo-homo. Are we many? Are we few? I always hear very contradictory views.
LikeLike
@Peter
“how do 1-2% jews hold a gun to the head of 55% Whites? I.e. very important aspects are not discussed and not understood.”
How can a microscopic amoeba kill a large human being?
How can a deer tick kill a large dog?
When a large organism exploits a smaller organism, we call it “predation” and no one is surprised.
Why should we be surprised when a small organism exploits a larger organism? It’s called “parasitism” in the animal kingdom – where’s the surprise? It would be a surprise if somehow human societies are susceptible to predation but not parasitism.
The Jewish problem is well understood, control of choke-points in society; money, trade, and in the modern world especially, media (including academia.)
What would happen if I started a religion/culture that is exactly the same as Judaism, except “whites” were the “Chosen People” and the “Master Race?” I’d be destroyed by the ADL, fired from my job, smeared on social media, and blacklisted from the banking system.
That’s how. It’s very well understood.
LikeLike
bannedhipster (can´t reply to your post below so I do it here, I hope that´s ok) : sure that is all entirely clear how the jews exert control… clear to the normal-thinking person… my remark referred to ringhtwingtards who may think that non-Whites oppress us, they give the impression that jews somehow oppress us. This is ridiculous because 55% can stand up and walk away and the 2% can´t do anything about it so it just needs to be made much more clear HOW the “suppression” works. To your comparison: the organism can NOT easily get rid of a parasite; we however can most easily get rid of the parasite: stand up and walk away. HOW it is prevented that we do so, that is what I mean that is not understood. If you say: the ADL does it, I say: why do we let them? How is it possible that 2% without a gun make us do things? If someone tells me: he made me…. he had no gun but he made me, I laugh at him. It needs to be made much more clear how that can happen.
There is another potentially deeply troubling aspect: could negroes ever pull something like the jews do? I doubt it because they lack the necessary intelligence -> i.e.: I fear the jews may actually have superior intelligence, at least as a group average. We still need to fight for our freedom, and in principle, we can most easily succeed because the jew does NOT point a gun at our heads: for every jewish product, there is a goy buyer or there would not be a problem: not with porn, not with drugs, not with financial products, not with bullshit theories, etc. The second we don´t buy jewish products, it´s over. The only question is if we Whites as a group can become intelligent enough to pull that. That I have to ask a question like that at all, shows already how troublesome the case is (how could it ever be a problem to stand up and walk away??).
LikeLike
@Peter
“we however can most easily get rid of the parasite: stand up and walk away. ”
But we can’t, obviously. If we could, we would have done so. Most people can’t even perceive the problem which is one reason why we can’t just “walk away.” The dog may know where it itches but has no clue there’s a tick under his skin, much less a bacterium in his blood.
Economically speaking, the Wight Island Model explains how an organized minority can dominate an unorganized minority. Consider that in Europe, Jews have had much less success dominating tightly knit ethnicities and are much more successful dominating in “diverse” areas or at the supra-national level like the EU or the Bonnier Group media companies.
“the ADL does it, I say: why do we let them? How is it possible that 2% without a gun make us do things?”
This is more of a metaphysical question than a practical question with an answer. We don’t “let them” – we don’t have the power to stop them.
Metaphysically, it’s because “white” was never really an ethnic group, not even in America. If things has shaken out slightly differently, we might have a Mormon-run America where the LDS ran the media and the banks and the Jews would be subservient to them.
“for every jewish product, there is a goy buyer or there would not be a problem: not with porn, not with drugs, not with financial products, not with bullshit theories, etc. ”
Some Eastern European fascist once said, “every society has the Jews they deserve” and made a similar point: if we were Morally Perfect the Jews could not seduce us with their vice trade.
But come on, human beings just aren’t like that.
“The only question is if we Whites as a group can become intelligent enough to pull that.”
That’s the thing. Early in the 20th Century, whites very, very much saw themselves as a group – what changed? Mass electronic media, mostly: radio, cinema, television, which was Jewish dominated and increasingly explicitly anti-white since the early days. Still, it took 75 years for it to play out. Most of our fathers were quite “Jew-wise” and our grandfathers even more so.
I mean, Communism would work if everyone wasn’t so selfish, but that’s just not human nature.
LikeLike
My idea is that if we actually run through the whole situation from A to Z, as an effort to create awareness… like, if we do this, the jew hits us with this, if we do this, the jew pulls this: that we can then see more clearly what steps are necessary. I guess all starts we Free Speech. Then comes identity, group belonging, group interest. Of-course financial system, blackmailing. I would like to see a good overview, diagram or so. I think that is missing, that´s why I say the method of the jew´s path to victory is not yet sufficiently understood. E.g.: why don´t we just do what the jew does and win ourselves? So what is really essential in the jew method.
I can´t do the job because I don´t have established a blog or so. I think it should be a forum for brainstorming, where all ideas are collected, and then the results are derived and presented.
LikeLike
Dear Banned Hipster, I do not actually care if this gets past moderation because I really only care if you see this, and I don’t want to thread hijack. I want you to know my thoughts on the following
– all the best
John Mark has deleted his YouTube and Twitter accounts and has left the movement
—–
For those of you not familiar with him he was a YouTuber who popularized “Propertarianism”. He became famous with a series of videos with millions of views exploring the potential for the present death of America to devolve into a violent conflict, and the steps needed to rationally separate to avoid the violence.
Think of him as Afterthought, only with a lot more audio-visual pizzazz.
On July 4th the Propertarian Bros held a rally the purpose of which was to ignite a Reformation of America. Were it not thousands of miles away I would have attended, but had I attended I would have been disappointed. The rally was not organized well, the logistics and “optics” were poor. Not to belabor it, but Curt Doolittle, the theorist, gave an awkward speech and then gave his platform to a black Marxist.
There are lessons here for November 4th, possibly earlier.
1) What we are doing is applying for a job. We are applying to be the government for a nation of 180 million people, with an inevitably large impact on billions of others around the world, to include our allies in Canada, Europe, Russia, Iceland, Greenland, Australia and New Zealand: the Northern / Polar Alliance.
When you go to a job interview, you dress for success, you prepare for typical questions, you know your selling points, you attempt to reassure doubts that come with any unknown. People want to trust that your government will, for instance, not worsen their quality of life, get tangled up in unnecessary conflicts, pick up the garbage on Friday; they want to trust that when they file a form with your government it will not get lost, but will be promptly acted upon, that when they go before the court they will have a fair trial and that the proverbial nephew of the prosecutor won’t get special treatment over them.
2) Selling Whitopia to whites shouldn’t be that hard, but it is turning out to be far harder than it needs to be. We must reassure folks that life will be very similar to the life we all know except without the people who hate us and want us dead. The laws will remain stable during a period of transition, and after an interval, we will open them up to modification through a fair and just process. Christianity will be respected again while non-Christians will be free of vexation for not practicing the majority religion. In other words, the new nation will be what we thought America was, only much much better.
3) People who put themselves forward must be supported spiritually and materially by those who do not. As this is war, all men of fighting age are duty bound to participate in one way or another, possibly to the max. Under no circumstances are you to point your weapon at your own people, it must be trained constantly on the Enemy. When advice needs to be given, it must be given in a brotherly way, to strengthen and ennoble. Likewise, resistance to the council of the wise must be seen as a character flaw, perhaps a fatal one.
4) This did not happen with the Propertarian Bros’ 4th of July rally. On the one hand, the event was not conducted with the gravitas and decorum that a true Declaration requires. On the other hand, the criticism was destructive, not ennobling. I will be reaching out to John Mark and Curt Doolittle to thank them for what they have done and what they choose to do in the days, months, and years ahead. Theirs was not the perfect or ultimate solution, but it was definitely in the ball park. One day soon a leader will emerge – cometh the hour, cometh the man – and at that time all silliness must stop and we must go “all in” for victory. The fate of the universe, whether mankind and mankind’s God will thrive into the indefinite and infinite future, or be Abolished by the Enemy and replaced by AI, robots, and transhumans, will be determined in the coming struggle.
LikeLike
@Afterthought
I thought Dolittle had some interesting ideas. I liked his point about the natural evolution of Parliament. We had the House of Lords to balance the Monarch. Then we added a House of Commons to enfranchise the average man. When it was time to enfranchise women, they should have created a separate House of Women as a third house of Parliament.
I also liked Dolittle’s attempt to derive property rights from the animal territorial instinct. This was superior to the typical Jewish Austrian attempts to derive libertarianism from abstract notions; Dolittle’s territoriality had the benefit of being based firmly in biology.
But Dolittle is an autist – they tend to make good idea guys, but terrible leaders; heavy on theory, zero on praxis.
John Marks was a good presenter. But the whole idea of a “New Declaration” was putting the cart way, way, way before the horse. It’s a perfect example of Cargo Cultism – the Founders had a Declaration, therefore if we write a declaration we’ll get the same results.
This is a typical mistake from an autist and a social media guy. The Declaration worked because they already had a really-existing “movement” – a government-in-waiting, headed by the richest man on the continent who was also a military officer: George Washington.
Holding a rally to sign a Declaration based on one guy’s philosophy he posted on Facebook and another guy who made Youtube videos? That’s a Cargo Cult, not a serious movement.
I’d suggest spending a lot of time listening to Musonius Rufus of Identity Dixie and the Rebel Yell podcast. Unlike a Cargo Cult, he has a very well thought out and very detailed strategy for creating the exact sort of real-life, on the ground network, a government-in-waiting, that could actually prevail in a crisis.
LikeLike
@Afterthought – I just watched the John Mark interview and really enjoyed it. So I”ll be having a look at his website and this propertarianism site as well. By chance do you have your own platform? I’m a guy looking for solutions. In August I’m leaving my corporate gig on the Left Coast and moving inland to a town that is 90% White with a population under 30K in the region, beautiful country. Opening up a shop on main street with a biz partner/extended family member. Very excited.
@BannedHipster – Thanks for the feedback on Afterthought’s thoughts. Damn it, I loath to admit it but, like Dolittle (…what’s in a name!) I may be a mild autist. I recall watching some of Dolittle’s stuff and propertarianism well over a year ago and thought it interesting. But I didn’t go to town on it. Haven’t watched anything he did in over a year. I’ll revisit it though.
This site and its insights are invaluable.
LikeLike
@Lyon
“I may be a mild autist.”
The kind of people that read – and write – blogs tend to be introverts and analytical. We have our talents, and our weaknesses. Obviously, I’m the same way, which is why I always try to check myself when I veer too much into ideology or theory.
It’s one reason I constantly attack “LARPing.” It’s easy to play-act online, to build conceptual towers that literally do not exist outside of people’s imaginations.
How many bloggers have created entire governmental structures on their blogs, yet couldn’t organize a soccer team in real life?
All of them?
There’s a guy who created “New Albion” – a New England separatist movement. He’s a town planner, so created a constitution, bylaws, and even the flag of his new nation, “New Albion.” He even came up with a tax structure.
All of it is nothing more than playing Sim City, or Dungeons and Dragons. It’s a video game, it’s a fantasy/sci-fi novel, what they call “world building.” Sure, it’s a fun creative exercise.
But if you’ve created a flag for your new republic, yet you can’t even organize a pub crawl, well, you’re just playing a game, at best, and LARPing and Cargo-culting at worst.
So, really, we have to stop this intellectual circle-jerk at some point. Theory has its place, but if your theory has more than, say, two points before the praxis has ever even been tried? You’re just play-acting at that point.
Philosophy 101. Descartes declared that he had “proved” the existence of God by merely writing some words down on paper. But how does writing some words down “prove” anything?
Et suppositio nil ponit in esse.
LikeLike
Confirming that the wisest use of resources is local is the centralization of law enforcement. The Floyd Show, choreographed by the “higher ups” and their paymasters in part to dis-empower local police.
https://www.jameslafond.com/article.php?id=12323
LikeLike
@bob saffron
I’m all about subsidiarity.
LikeLike
@Banned Hipster
Re: Et suppositio nil ponit in esse.
Saying it don’t make ‘er so. Touché
LikeLike
Our big problem is wannabe leaders who share the same mindset of those whose solution to a looming nuclear apocalypse is to tax the rubes to construct luxury underground bunkers from which they can tax any rubes aboveground who survived being nuked.
The year 1776 should not be the model we plan on. We need to study the year Argentina melted down. There is already a blog or memoir on line from someone who actually lived through it with a lot of useful insights, information, and suggestions that an unofficial organization masquerading as a charity could implement.
LikeLike
@Cly
I did some research on the top 200 private companies in America. The leadership class – owners, their families, the executives – are overwhelmingly white men. Many are billionaires, the rest are multi-hundred-millionaires.
Kevin MacDonald once lamented that while Jewish billionaires pour their fortune into Jewish causes, anti-white causes, and Zionist organizations, rich whites … collect stuff, engage in weird hobbies.
When they are politically engaged, the do what the Kochs do – promote mass non-white immigration – or what Gates and Buffet did.
Both Gates and Buffet made their money far from the NYC/Wall Street axis. They merged their fortunes into the Bill Gates Foundation. What does the Gates Foundation do?
Invest in vaccines in Africa and promote high-end immigration to the US.
Our white elites hate us worse than the Jews do.
How is it Mitt Romney, an American oligarch and a leader of a religion founded in the middle of America, is so anti-white? You would think the Mormons could become the premier American tribe – they were officially pro-white all the way until 1980s.
But nothing, if anything, Romney is as anti-white as Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL.
Until that changes, I’m a Full Tankie Communist – I’m fine with literally arresting the white billionaires and confiscating their fortunes.
If they aren’t going to lead, they are not worth protecting due to “capitalist” ideology. And if they take the anti-white side, they are just straight-up enemies, worse than enemies, they are traitors.
LikeLike
I get where you are coming from, but I am far and away from expecting any savior of White people to come from any Whites who most certainly benefited from White working class dispossession.
Never mind that what amounts to the racial and cultural cannibalism they have engaged in will ultimately swallow them.
Historically, the enemy eliminates any established White elite, no matter how early and easily that class has been alienated from the people they were supposed to lead.
Decapitation always ends in death. However, even in formerly White ruled countries that have degenerated into mongrelized majorities, there are isolated rump populations of pure Whites like in Iran and Afghanistan, for example.
To the outside world, they seem poor and the Usual Suspects will do handstands to convince you that they are not White but actually Asian. Whatever.
They evolved from a group of Whites who did not atomize and end up absorbed into Non-White populations. The only aspect of the others that influenced them was tribalism.
We don’t need a Koch Brother to rescue us or this “too big to fail” farce run by jokers. We need tight tribal ties with skilled White workers to help us scavenge something salvageable from what is left.
We also need people who are cognizant of the damage soulless materialism has done to our people so that they will nail the door behind the rent seekers infesting our land.
LikeLike
I hold little hope for a Western renaissance while the Copyright Question goes largely ignored. Rather ironic that many of victims of censorship support the very institution that has allowed for the formation of (((oligopolies))) to control information.
http://subsol.c3.hu/subsol_2/contributors0/nimustext.html
LikeLike
“Copyright strikes” an effective weapon in the information-control arsenal.
LikeLike