I haven’t written anything about the ridiculous “autonomous zone” in Seattle because I’ve seen the same old shit for 20 years, since the 1990’s. I’ll be completely honest: I would cringe reading the things I believed in my teens and 20’s and I’m sure that’s true for most people.

But two quick points that are illustrative. Some white guy live streaming from “CHAZ/CHOP” witnesses the recent shooting. He is told by security to “stay put” – and he immediately, submissively complies with the authority figure. But a few minutes later, a black “security” comes up to him, curses him out, and steals his phone and the guy presumably runs away.

Then, the black “security” hands it to a white “security” who notices the phone has a default background thus surmises that it was a “set up” – the shootings were “staged” – presumably by the “outside agitators” – and this white guy was in on the conspiracy. The conspiracy to make CHAZ/CHOP “look bad.”

So what does the white “security” do? He attempts to destroy the evidence. You know, so “right wing news media” won’t show the footage of the shooting to make them “look bad.”

Their “security” is worse than the actual police – surprise, surprise. Or better, not a surprise to any functioning adult with a handle on human nature.

This is at least what conservatism – not political conservatism, but the conservative instinct – the instinct that “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” – understands. Chesterton’s fence.

In the matter of reforming things, as distinct from deforming them, there is one plain and simple principle; a principle which will probably be called a paradox. There exists in such a case a certain institution or law; let us say, for the sake of simplicity, a fence or gate erected across a road. The more modern type of reformer goes gaily up to it and says, “I don’t see the use of this; let us clear it away.”

To which the more intelligent type of reformer will do well to answer: “If you don’t see the use of it, I certainly won’t let you clear it away. Go away and think. Then, when you can come back and tell me that you do see the use of it, I may allow you to destroy it.”

The young and naive don’t understand why institutions and social norms exist. This modern brand of “the left” – the “woke” – to include many feminists – believe that every institution and every social norm was invented so white men can “oppress women and minorities” – thus it is good to destroy everything.

I enjoy listening to amateur covers on youtube. I stumbled across a little girl singing “Roar” a pop hit by Katy Perry from a decade ago. She was a good singer, but it was accompanied by a professionally produced 1980’s style music video. “Roar” is itself one of those “female empowerment” anthems but the cover video took it to another level.

The little girl doesn’t want to join the ballet class, full of girls. She wants to join the karate class, full of boys. So she breaks in the karate tournament and out-karates all the boys, even the ones three times her size.

It’s so ironic. Something designed for the female body – ballet – is discouraged for girls and instead they are taught to dream of engaging in martial arts – made for male bodies.

As the old Christian anti-feminist blogger Dalrock noted, it’s not that they want to destroy gender norms, they just want to reverse gender norms. They don’t want equality, they want men performing traditionally feminine roles and women performing traditionally masculine roles. They don’t want sameness, they want reversal. It’s fundamentally a transgender ideology.

This white lefty, writing as “New Press,” believes so strongly in the “racist cops” narrative he attributes to outside forces the fact that “people of color” keep acting “racially divisive.”

No, whitey, they don’t want equality. They want supremacy. They don’t want to get rid of the cops – they want to be the cops. When a black man says “shut up white boy and give me money” it’s not because of “white supremacy” – it is his bid for supremacy.

Just read the delusion of the white lefty:


Similarly, a mayor subordinating protest “leaders,” by means unknown, to a platform of divisive rhetoric and timid reform, to undermine a protest’s capacity for cooperation could also be described as counterintelligence. This appears to be what’s happening in Seattle, to some extent, though it’s unclear who’s subordinated and who’s subordinating.

While I don’t have enough information about who’s who among the protest leadership to profile and evaluate the various identities at play, I’ve witnessed on several occasions people of color on bullhorns sowing division by using rhetoric that appeared to have been deliberately designed to stoke internal conflict. Specifically, I’ve seen accusations of wanting integrity from one bullhorn to another and the devaluation of perspective based on demographic. On at least one occasion, these public disputes have physically divided and confused the crowd about the content of the protest.

People in the crowd, meanwhile, seemed ready to yield to the directions given to them by the nearest bullhorn simply on the basis of good faith and white guilt, but no one should be so timid when the integrity of the movement is at stake.

Hey – white boy – it ain’t the mayor hiring undercover “people of color” to sow divisive rhetoric. Those “people of color” mean what they say – they hate you because you are white. They want what you got – your phone, for one, and you ten dollar cover charge. Then, they want your ATM card, your bike, your car, and then your girlfriend and your daughter. Then, they want you to drop dead, and the only reason they don’t kill you is because the “racist cops” may arrest them.

There was a meme a few years ago. A black guy was complaining, “why aren’t computers easy to use, like a DVD player? It’s because racist whites don’t want blacks to be able to use them.”

White boy – consider the mentality behind that statement. It’s not, “let us make computers.” It’s not “teach us computers.” It’s “you make the computers, make them easy enough to use that I can use them, then give them to me.”

It’s called “slavery” and if you sell yourself into it, they will be more than happy to tell you what to do. And they will want you to do all the things they can’t do themselves.

Of course it’s impossible to reason with a black BLMer, because fundamentally they just hate white people and are enraged that they are not necessary for white society to operate, in fact, are nothing but a burden to white society.

It’s also impossible to reason with a white Antifa wokester. They are in the grips of a fundamentalist religion, one they learned in high school and college and from the media, that plays on their psychological type.

You have to expect that not a few white lefties will be “red pilled” by the black violence of the last month. There’s another viral video of a white “Karen” crying and covering her face as she is set up to be slandered on social media – she knows what’s coming. She didn’t even do anything, she was just a handy target, but social media will make her out to be some sort of “white supremacist Karen.”

Sorry, white leftist, sorry, Karens, it’s about race. Yes, truly, the ruling classes use anti-whiteness and wokeness to “divide and conquer.” But the only reason they can do that is because they already united and conquered by forcing different people together. They can go back and forth for longer than you can stay sane, or alive for that matter.

The only winning move is to not play. #WhiteStrike