Thanks to the tireless efforts of a Curtis Yarvin and Jim Donald acolyte NRx “Scotsman” calling xirself “aidanmaclear” we’ve found a new meme, to replace “Eskimo” and the triple parentheses.
“Neo-Calvinist.”
…
Henry Ford
December 28, 2019 at 1:41 am
Amusingly, the 1860s is when the First neo-Calvinists (cough) migrated from Germany to America, and the 1870s is when they made their first fortunes, the fortunes that laid the path for all the other ones.
Consider the case of General Order No. 11 (issued by no less a man than Ulysses S. Grant):
1. The neo-Calvinists, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the Department [of the Tennessee] within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order. 2. Post commanders will see to it that all of this class of people be furnished passes and required to leave, and any one returning after such notification will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permit from headquarters. 3.No passes will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application of trade permits.[9]
And Ulysses S. Grant’s explanation to the Assistant Secretary of War:
Sir, I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into Post Commanders, that the Specie regulations of the Treasury Dept. have been violated, and that mostly by neo-Calvinists and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied of this have I been at this that I instructed the Commdg Officer at Columbus [Kentucky] to refuse all permits to neo-Calvinists to come south, and frequently have had them expelled from the Dept. [of the Tennessee]. But they come in with their Carpet sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The neo-Calvinists seem to be a privileged class that can travel any where. They will land at any wood yard or landing on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy Cotton themselves they will act as agents for someone else who will be at a Military post, with a Treasury permit to receive Cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the neo-Calvinist will buy up at an agreed rate, paying gold. There is but one way that I know of to reach this case. That is for Government to buy all the Cotton at a fixed rate and send it to Cairo, St Louis, or some other point to be sold. Then all traders, they are a curse to the Army, might be expelled.[10]
“The neo-Calvinists seem to be a privileged class that can travel any where.”
Lol.
…
https://aidanmaclear.wordpress.com/2019/12/26/proles-carpetbaggers-and-reaction/
Second, thanks to long time commenter “guest” we have a new strategy: Redneck Game
Find yourself a cute trailer park gal and the day after her 18th birthday, knock her up and keep knocking her up. The more live births, the higher your score. When she taps out, get a new one.
Feed ’em on EBT and vote for Andrew Yang. We can significantly increase the white population in a decade.
Here’s some motivational material:
Banned Hipster 
You have it backwards, it’s about getting out of the trailer! Because with every two kids you qualify for bigger government housing, at least in Europe, housing you couldn’t afford even working several minimum wage jobs. I often pass a literal villa where the government is parking a big gypsy family, and each time walking by i think this could have been me, if i had played my cards right. I’m serious, if you are on the dole, school lunches are free, books, school trips, kindergartens, you don’t have to file taxes and no collection agency can touch your cheese, what’s the downside? Hence if i could do it again, i’d go full redneck, be a hipster redneck in my sweet gov crib.
LikeLike
@guest
Um, no. There is nothing like any of that in America. We don’t have “welfare” here except if you are a single mother you can get $50 dollars a week to buy rice and pasta for your kids.
LikeLike
Speaking of redneck hipsters:
Feeding your dog lobster is pretty hip, and redneck!
LikeLike
@guest
I’m not even going to lie, she has a great rack and I would definitely hit it.
LikeLike
@guest
She could be a character in the Sopranos.
I think her mental issues could be real though, since she likes to post videos of herself getting into fights with strangers. Also she looked pretty cute in that video you posted, yet a year and a half later she looks 10 years older.
LikeLike
Wow – this is proof that Google’s machine learning is getting amazing.
The video of the redneck Sopranos lobster welfare queen had these on its “recommended” list.
I watched the video and the algorithm decided I wanted to also watch videos of verbally aggressive working-class white women with tattoos, etc.
I mean, think of it, the machine learning actually got this.
Impressive.
But, ugh tattoos on women are totally disgusting as is verbal aggression. But I’ll take those southern trailer accents any day.
Then there is this:
Orangeburg, South Carolina. LOL. That girl’s mother should be arrested for child abuse. In fact, someone reading this should go kidnap that girl and do the right thing.
LikeLike
OK, we shouldn’t be mocking this because it’s clearly mental illness.
But, “you’re not a real drug dealer, you’re a fraud, give me the fucking money Clare” is really, really funny. Redneck Sopranos is spot on.
“Josh promised you a wondeful life, he was going to be a rich computer programmer and give you $600 to get mustache lazer removel!”
This is better than the Sopranos, I would watch this no kidding.
LikeLike
Heh.
Anyway, Aidan McClear is the same author as Jim, unless for some occult reason he’s intentionally decided to adopt certain signature turns of phrase.
As for myself, I think it important to let everyone know how much I love the post-9/11 government. It really is one of the most incredible things to exist, perhaps one of the most incredible things to have ever existed.
And it was pure evil of the former American government to neglect the holy land and let the Jewish people be almost overrun by the barbarians to whom it so gallantly brings democracy and human rights.
Quite simply, that is not who we are, and those who think otherwise can and should be thrown in camps. It is the only moral thing to do with those who cannot help themselves but think incorrectly. I have no doubt that all of our fellow white people can agree with this sentiment.
All hail our greatest ally.
LikeLike
@Henry Ford
MacClear isn’t Jim Donald, he merely repeat Donald’s phrases.
Guys like Jim Donald have a very “cult leader” way of writing. I’ve commented on it before. It can seem profound until you break it down (it’s full of stuff like the fallacy of the binary choice, etc.)
Born betas like MacClear literally absorb the cult-leader phraseology and repeat it, over and over again, giving the impression its the same writer.
LikeLike
“cult leader”
Yes, that’s exactly right. Thought control, beta orbiters, the whole bit.
…
Look. I must tell you, I don’t find 9/11 talk to be very interesting. It isn’t persuasive, and no one will ever believe anything not preapproved for consumption by their authority figures.
Furthermore, American imperial intervention in the Middle East is basically rational. The Soviet Union occupied Afghanistan until it dissolved — (the dissolution is another story).
Then we had the nineties, a unique historical period: Russia was being ravaged by undiluted Harvard neoliberal capitalism and China was still dirt poor, so it was all America, all the time.
Then with Pearl Harbor 2.0, America went straight for…you guessed it, Afghanistan. Operation Desert Storm began October 7th, 2001. What a turnaround, right? not even a full month: people tend to forget that for some reason.
If you wind back the clock, the British spent centuries hecking around in that country. Clearly it’s some sort of grand geopolitical center. You could spin a yarn about Israel’s malignant influence causing everyone to salivate over this backwards country since the European conquest of the world, but it wouldn’t be a good one. A simple person might notice a continuous historical thread of oceanic-merchant Anglo power, China, and opium.
Then you can talk about the Bank of England, but that’s another story.
We’re now nearly as far from 9/11 as 9/11 was from Nixon’s ousting. 9/11 will fade into insignificance but Nixon will remain, for this is the post-Nixon timeline.
The Deep Throat timeline.
“The British are coming! the British are coming!”
LikeLike
@Henry Ford
I’ve said this since forever: you can understand Israel’s malign influence by it’s distortion of US foreign policy.
You are correct, Afghanistan is in the USA’s imperial interests, although exactly why I’m not sure, and I’m not the only one confused about it. Sure, it was always understandable why it was in Russia’s, but it’s not at all clear why it is in the USA.
Even if the Zionist entity currently occupying Palestine didn’t exist, the USA would still have imperial interests in Afghanistan.
But we see the Zionist distortion in Iraq. The oil companies, including their representatives in the Bush administration, were very much opposed to a war in Iraq. Saddam Hussein is exactly the kind of authoritarian leader that international corporations can deal with. The instability caused by the Iraq war hurt oil company profits and eventually gave China a temporary toe-hold in the oil market there.
Iraq was purely in the interests of the Zionist entity.
There is also some complication with the 9/11 War against Afghanistan, though, because the Bush administration had just inked a deal with the Taliban when the 9/11 false flag happened. Let’s not forget the Israelis tried to blame it on Iraq, then Iran, which they claimed were in cahoots with Osama Bin Laden, although tat was so insulting to everyone’s intelligence it didn’t work on anyone except hoi polloi – remember, the majority of Americans believed that Saddam Hussein did 9/11 by late 2002, simply because Dick Cheney kept hinting at it.
LikeLike
Yeah, but so what? It’s a package deal. America the continent is flanked by the world’s oceans; America the country is virtually self-sufficient in all vital natural resources (and is thus uniquely autarkic); America the people (Protestant Anglo-Germans) feel this in their bones and have resisted overseas military escapades since they transcended explicit European meddling in the Civil War.
The Jews own the newspapers, and they determine the mobilization of the American military force. This is the story of both of the World Wars and subsequent establishment of Israel.
The effectiveness of the news media’s war drums is trending monotonously to zero, but is that because the psychological technology is diminishing in effectiveness or because it’s increasingly run as a third-generation company? (The 2015—TBD decline of NYT is a stunning example of this phenomenon.)
And by the way, let’s just call it Israel, okay? “Zionist entity occupying Palestine” is just 2 edgy 4 me.
Oh, boy.
Here, have some links:
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-Iqz3ytYcb3wWYJ0c
Click to access The_Anglo-American_Establishment.pdf
https://archive.org/details/DopeInc.BritainOpiumWarAgainstTheUs1978.pdfVersion2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Warburg
https://web.archive.org/web/20150612091258/http://anolen.com/2015/05/15/kim-philby-and-saddam-hussein/
Bon voyage.
LikeLike
@Henry Ford
ANolen.com, I’ve probably been her biggest promoter for going on five years now. I’ve read her entire site, even her early fiction stuff. Too bad she disappeared.
Why would I, or any American, want to spill blood and treasure for the imperial interests of the apartheid regime of Jew bigotry in Zionist-occupied Palestine and their fifth column of traitors in their diaspora?
That’s what.
Surely your namesake would agree!
LikeLike
Nice. Yes, too bad about that.
See, this is the sort of thing nobody cares about.
>apartheid
>regime
>bigotry
These words aren’t analytical. They’re pure rhetoric. And if you’re trying to persuade me with them, you can stop. Because fundamentally, your problem is that I’m one of the finest rhetoricians ever to walk this fair planet. Propagandists, probably, also.
[If someone is reading this at the psywar division of the CIA or wherever, drop me a line. I want to rake in the cash and watch the world burn.]
And this is, like, bush-league stuff. It’s kind of offensive, actually, to be perfectly honest with you. I demand better, something like “a policy coup“. That’s the sort of thing that grabs my attention. You’re going to have to do better.
Anyway. No one gives a damn about Israeli uhpression of Muslims in the Middle East, not a single living soul, except perhaps a few paid think tank shills in D.C. funded by who-hecking-cares, and they don’t have souls.
You could appeal to my studied non-interest in imperial adventure if you emphasized the cost to the taxpayer — (I also don’t care about the “human” cost, since they’re all lowly-paid mercenaries who signed up voluntarily) — but you’ve already conceded that, in principle, American intervention in the Middle East is rational, and taking the dates of the invasion of Afghanistan (October 7th, 2001) and the invasion of Iraq (March 2003), we can infer the relative importance of the two foreign political adventures. This, even assuming that the invasion of Iraq was in no way advantageous to any native Americans.
You really should’ve made the argument that Zionism sucks because it seeks to bury America in an unrelenting stream of immigration, i.e., nationalism for me but not for thee.
That would’ve at least been persuasive.
Assuming that I’m vulnerable to the siren song of nationalism, which is of course by no means guaranteed.
Just saying.
And yes, I’m pretty sure my nom de guerre would agree with this assessment, considering his boner for Adolf Hitler, the founder of Israel.
LikeLike
Why would I want to persuade you? I have zero interest in arguing with those who are very, very sensitive about criticism of Jews and Israel. They aren’t worth arguing with.
Why would I want to waste my time arguing with kids getting paid $12 an hour to copy and paste talking points from the Hasbara manual, or even adult partisans of the Zionist entity with a chip on their shoulder?
You must have me mistaken for someone who gives a damn about Jew’s feelings.
That’s not my problem. I don’t have a problem.
Your problem is that you are a self-declared “finest rhetoricians ever to walk this fair planet” yet you are reduced to bitching on a blog about how unfairly the Zionist entity gets treated by people who don’t care.
It’s truly astonishing you don’t have better things to do with your time, considering your amazing rhetorical skills. I guess people just haven’t figured out how amazing you are!
LikeLike
Interesting. So you do the out-group flip just as easily as Jim, but in the opposite direction.
Let me clear something up: as a factual matter, I literally, literally could not care less about Israel, either way.
Additionally, I’m not a Muslim, so I don’t care about Muslims in Palestine. I don’t care who does what to them, whether 2edge4me “Zionist entity” half-Arabs or anyone else. Do you care about ants?
I loathe the proposition (pushed by many, such as yourself) that I’m supposed to care about Israel any more than I care about other tiny, irrelevant countries in small, irrelevant regions of the world.
And I find this quote pretty ironic:
Considering as it’s your blog that I’m gracing with my majestic presence.
This, irrespective of the truth value of your claim, which is false. Quite frankly, I find it saddening when people care about Israel.
Thank you for acknowledging my propagandistic excellence, and I will now reiterate the following hilarious fact:
I am indeed the best, and everyone says so.
LikeLike
Maybe comparing me to Jim Donald will really get under my skin like critiques of Zionism totally don’t get under yours.
I’m terrified you’re going to start using your world class rhetorical skills any time now.
LikeLike
Nonsense. I like you too much to subject you to my rhetorical weapons of mass destruction, mobile rhetorical facilities, or roving vans of mass rhetorical Germanism.
Lol.
The point is this: you can critique Zionism without being a pathetic moralcuck for some of the least sympathetic people on earth (Palestinian Muslims).
You’re caught in an MKULTRA mind-vice and I can help you escape. I stand grandly on the battlefield, bullets whizzing aimlessly, a faint illuminating my perfect golden locks, pale blue eyes illuminated as if by internal fire, and I offer you my angelic hand.
Let us journey together, and together we will blame the Jews for things that matter.
LikeLike
You totally don’t care about Israel but get triggered if someone chooses Palestians over Israelis. It really gets under your skin.
If you did’t care – you wouldn’t care. But you clearly do.
LikeLike
I grew up with goatse. I don’t know why you think you’re capable of “triggering” me.
You don’t have to “choose” Palestinians over Israelis or Israelis over Palestinians. You don’t have to give a damn.
But it’s true that I can more easily identify with a bunch of mostly “white” Nietscheans, that I can tell you. Or at least I can respect them for their preternatural vigor, even as they (allegedly) seek my destruction.
Let’s return to the original quote.
Apartheid, as you know, is an Afrikaans (Dutch?) word that means “apart-ness”. The Boer people of South Africa (another mostly “white” race, at 5% admixture) established and ran a perfectly sensible civilisation for the better part of a century before ultimately being overrun by Communist proxies, and I challenge you to intelligibly disagree.
They seemed like a decent group, though I wouldn’t want to intermarry with them. Personally, my resonance was much higher with the English Rhodesians — imagine having a country five thousand times the population and failing to produce a statesman the equal of Ian Smith in the past one hundred years.
When you attack someone, you can’t attack them for being right; you have to attack them for being wrong.
LikeLike
Yet you just said you don’t give a fuck about Israel.
Sure thing, Chaim. “Hello, fellow Whites!”
I was also amused with the whole “German” and “Nazi” thing. I get it – I’m an “anti-semite” therefore I must be a “nazi” therefore Nietzsche therefore you’re going to appeal to me by being “supremacist” and posturing as amoral.
It’s astonishing how the lack of the ability to empathize with other people correlates with the absolute self-unawareness. It’s projection, in a very autistic way. You really think you can just waltz right in and fool the “goyim” by pretending to be a “nazi” – because, we’re all just a bunch of dumb “nazi goys,” eh?
Also, you are obviously not old enough to have “grown up” with goatse, by the way. You write like a teenager.
Now you’re just boring me, so go away.
LikeLike
I apologize for boring you. I will be short.
There’s obviously no way for me to prove it, and even if I could I wouldn’t do identify myself, but I’m not a Jew. As I understand it, you’re descended from flesh-and-blood Americans; it’s likely that my lineage is even older than yours.
I don’t care about Israel, which is a geopolitical entity, except inasmuch as it has undertaken activities injurious to my interests, certain of which alleged activities (should they be true) may justify appropriate action. I have tremendous respect for the Jews in that I wish my own people weren’t such miserable cucks: I would like us to be more like the Jews in the ways that matter, as the Jews in so many ways embody the conquering spirit. They were small and insignificant; no one handed the world to them; they took it for themselves.
“(allegedly)”
Recall my very first comment on this blog.
When I read Nietsche what I took away wasn’t an essential “amorality.” Nietsche was a deeply moral person, and I don’t know why so many miss this.
“Nazi” is a fake concept. “Supremacist” is a fake concept. The fittest survive, and that is how it is.
You are using the words of those who will your destruction. In using their words, you think their thoughts. In thinking their thoughts, you are led around as a dog on a leash. “A prison for your mind.”
I regret my second comment, though I will not apologize for it, for clearly I made an enemy out of a friend.
So long.
LikeLike
LikeLike